Because I think it's important we keep parts of the game fair that have very long lasting consequences... maybe by this criteria only the ruler (if elected once) must have fair elections.
Theres just something I find annoying about having a King's (or any equivalent title's) seat open to bribes... it just seems too big for that type of !@#$...
Why is it too big for that !@#$?
You still have some sort of fairness guiding you to that. But there is no fairness in real life and where we would have rebellions and backstabbing, we now have elections so we should make the elections less reliable.
It is the elections that happens once where this would pay off for real, not the ones where it happens monthly.
