This is starting to remind me of the case against the Zuma GM. Vellos made a mistake. Unlike most multi cheats, who are both violating a explicit rule, and generally having their family PROFIT from the action, there is no evidence that Vellos profited at all from his mistake. Thanks to his honesty we now have clarified how the vulgarity feature works.
This game is NOT a court of law. I have no idea how we appear to attract so many aspiring lawyers to the game either. As the social contract says, play the game like you are playing with friends. I sure as hell wouldn't enact punitive punishments against one of my friends if they came clean about a mistake they made regarding the rules.
