stuff
None of this matters because the existence or non-existence of a clan (for lack of a better word) is not the issue, or even a question: Existence was already determined before this complaint was raised.
Basic principle of law, an accused has a chance to defend himself. You don't try him in the backroom without him even knowing he was on trial.
A question was raised in open court on recusal - should I answer him in the backroom where it cannot reach him? The parts of the forum I am referring to are open to all. I raise nothing hidden. And yes, I do think so. It is painfully obvious. A discussion is hardly necessary. But if you wish to in the backroom by all means.
Those with a stake in the outcome of this case have been notified and, therefore, have the option and ability to influence this case. At this point, the only benefit to making any list of suspects public is blackening their reputation.
