The above is the personal opinion of one Magistrate, and as such should not be considered reflective of the Magistrates collectively.
Were the player in question to not disband the militia as asked, the Magistrates would collectively review the situation. But, crucially, exactly what we would do is not yet determined.
To review is to go outside the scope of the Magistrate function. There is and never has been any clause to review for failure to comply. If it happens again, then file a new case. Any further action on cases closed needs to be referred to everyone-knows-who. All case have been and are settled
as-is.
Since the militia is already being strengthened let's look for a double whammy or even triple. Just lock his account for 3 days every 3 days until a new lord takes over to disband the militia.
I'm calling punishing a player again and again until he
complies a Magistrate abuse. Now that's got to be a first. Our verdict did not and does not hinge on future compliance by the player. Of course, I'll admit - this could be a clever way to increase magisterial powers.
Crucially, what we would do if the militia was not disbanded was not raised in discussion during the verdict (any verdict in any case) because it was never going to be a point of contention once the case was closed. Wait - must have been my opinion again.