I want to answer two things from the previous thread:
1. The Zuma GM accusing me of lying about their attack being unannounced. No, not lying. It wasn't. The first communication I received from Haktoo concerning it was about a week or two after they'd been in Demyansk. Had we not retreated, we would have been in a battle in Demyansk and not had an explanation for over 2 weeks. Yes, that's partly because of OOC activities, which is fine. But, just as the Zuma GM resents being called malicious, I rather resent falsely being called a liar as well.
2. Tim asking what I want- I've said it multiple times in every thread about the Zuma. I want the Zuma to stop stopping every conflict. If they want to attack Terran alongside Kabrinskia and destroy us, fine, go ahead. Do it. Better that than where we all sit around and stare at each other and argue about the Zuma. If they want to go back home to their Volcano, fine, go ahead, and stay there. If the Zuma are going to be out and about interfering in human politics, they shouldn't do so as the peace-enforcers. They need to either stay home and be an RP curiosity that is only moved by events of fantastically huge magnitude (like if realms were actually planning to destroy them) or else actually use their power as a GM should: to shake the game up, prevent stagnation, and keep it interesting. I have said that or something to that effect every time the Zuma have ever been discussed. But their current behavior is very difficult to play alongside, and not just for me. Super-secret dealings with a few players brokering stagnation is not fun.
