Oh, one last thing (sorry for many posts; this is an issue I've been pondering for a while):
I request that, no matter their ruling, Magistrates clearly define at least one example of non-abusive incorrect reporting. That is; I ask that they provide an example (or some kind of rule) that could show an example where somebody reported something that wasn't ruled vulgar, but where they weren't abusing the system. That is; I want the Magistrates to clarify the difference between abuse and incorrect reporting: because the system obviously allows for incorrect reporting; that's why your peers get to judge, and it isn't automatic.
