Seriously why ?
Person A clearly go against general consensus aim to get 2 persons dead 1st day, both innocent, put ourselves at risk acting in a way to CLEARLY harm us and then make FALSE accusation ( said I didn't like 3 person bc they vote against Slapstick while none of the 3 did)
Person B acted against double lynching innocent, act and make recommendation to help us and participate in debate. His assumption so far was right like me.
Then person A accuses B and others WITHOUT any logic reason ( I think he said I vote for him I hope some of you know why ? ) Isn't it shady ?And people follow him because " I find suspicious he said I am clearly not an assassin".
Big news guys : I am clearly not an assassin too.
VOTE ROSS
