Erm, no. If the developer of the game calls it an abuse and an exploit, and has to actually change the mechanics of the game to prevent this happening again, I'd say there most certainly is something wrong.
Tom didn't forbid banning. He made it cost an hour because he felt it was overpowered. I agree with that, it makes sense. It doesn't change that judges can ban people because of a personal agenda. You may think they are on your team, but there will be cases when they disagree. And you don't have the right to call them idiots when they do.
