Main Menu

News:

Please be aware of the Forum Rules of Conduct.

Unit IR Vs Army specialty

Started by Penchant, September 28, 2012, 11:17:16 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Penchant

I am currently Marshal of an army and was considering putting unit restrictions on the army, as in not that they can't have that unit but if they do they will be moved to the other army so my army is all, for example cavalry and special forces. It's not a you must have this type of unit, its you must have thistle of unit to be in this army. Is that against the IR's or is it ok?
"The true soldier fights not because he hates what is in front of him, but because he loves what is behind him."
― G.K. Chesterton

Tom

That's totally fine with me. You are working with what people have instead of restricting what they can do. That's exactly how to deal everything that touches IRs.

Chenier

Quote from: Tom on September 28, 2012, 11:46:12 PM
That's totally fine with me. You are working with what people have instead of restricting what they can do. That's exactly how to deal everything that touches IRs.

Unless the general decides that those who lead archers (or any unit type) always sit in the capital and never get to do anything, indirectly forcing them to choose something else.

Extra precision from Tom's earlier statements.
Dit donc camarade soleil / Ne trouves-tu ça pas plutôt con / De donner une journée pareil / À un patron

Vellos

Quote from: Chénier on September 28, 2012, 11:57:30 PM
Unless the general decides that those who lead archers (or any unit type) always sit in the capital and never get to do anything, indirectly forcing them to choose something else.

Extra precision from Tom's earlier statements.

+1
"A neutral humanism is either a pedantic artifice or a prologue to the inhuman." - George Steiner