Main Menu

Q & A - - -Topic: Margrave of Capital asks all priests to change class

Started by Eldargard, January 21, 2013, 01:08:56 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Eldargard

I honestly have to admit that this is all quite ridiculous. One day you all announce that requests are ok and the next you do this. I I honestly do not know how to express my disappointment. Draw a CLEAR line and stick to it. There is so much ambiguity involved with this IR that all these judgements seem quite worthless.

Draco Tanos

I'd say that the difference is that he's targetting priests.  How he should have worded it:

QuoteLetter from Actrial Erendegard   (11 hours, 44 minutes ago)
Message sent to everyone in your realm (25 recipients)

I would like to ask all nobles to pick up the sword again, for we need every knight possible to defend the realm!  Our very existence is at stake!  For <realm>!  For glory!

Actrial Erendegard
Margrave of Oritolon

Obviously with my own RPish embellishments, but you get the idea.

Do the Magistrates/Tom agree on this difference?

vonGenf

Quote from: Unwin on January 21, 2013, 01:08:56 PM
I honestly have to admit that this is all quite ridiculous. One day you all announce that requests are ok and the next you do this. I I honestly do not know how to express my disappointment. Draw a CLEAR line and stick to it. There is so much ambiguity involved with this IR that all these judgements seem quite worthless.

It seems to me that the line is quite clear:

QuoteI wish I had more warriors. I'd even pay their recruitment costs!

^ This is a request.

QuoteI don't want any priests.

^ This is a violation of the IR.
After all it's a roleplaying game.

Tom

The difference as I see it, not explicitly related to this case:

Not ok:
"You there, I need you to become (some class)."

Ok:
"We could need more (some class), everyone. I'm filling up the war chest right now."


Where is the line? The line is NOT whether it's a request or an order. The IR page makes it clear that requests and orders are the same when it comes to IRs.
The difference is whether or not someone is told to change his class. Or you are making a factual statement about the needs of the realm. Semantically speaking, the difference is the object of your speech. If you are talking about the realm in a way that does not address or point towards one or a small number of individuals, that's fine because nobody needs to feel pressured.

Vellos

Because I'm a cranky person, I'll also note that repeated and emphatic statements by powerful folks and a realm culture hostile to inconvenient classes would raise questions in my mind regarding IRs.

Occasional statements like the above, fine.

Weekly broadsides to the whole realm pressuring nobles to change when only 1 person is in an inconvenient class... IR violation, IMHO.
"A neutral humanism is either a pedantic artifice or a prologue to the inhuman." - George Steiner

egamma

The proper way for Kai/Actrial to have phrased this would be "I will give 100 gold to any noble who desires to serve Oritolon on the battlefield and needs assistance with hiring a unit." No mention of priests, and there could be diplomats/infils/etc who need assistance with their unit.

Penchant

Quote from: egamma on January 21, 2013, 09:11:14 PM
The proper way for Kai/Actrial to have phrased this would be "I will give 100 gold to any noble who desires to serve Oritolon on the battlefield and needs assistance with hiring a unit." No mention of priests, and there could be diplomats/infils/etc who need assistance with their unit.
No need for a benefit the important thing is that he singled out a group of nobles instead of it being a general statement to the realm.
"The true soldier fights not because he hates what is in front of him, but because he loves what is behind him."
― G.K. Chesterton

Chenier

Quote from: Unwin on January 21, 2013, 01:08:56 PM
I honestly have to admit that this is all quite ridiculous. One day you all announce that requests are ok and the next you do this. I I honestly do not know how to express my disappointment. Draw a CLEAR line and stick to it. There is so much ambiguity involved with this IR that all these judgements seem quite worthless.

The line WAS drawn in the last judgement. And in every judgement relating to that IR. All magistrate comments have been coherent, and said the same thing. You can make vague requests for more of a certain class, as long as it's clear nobody is targeted, but you can't tell any specified group of people (ex: priests) to switch to another class. One is a pointer to people who don't mind what class they play and would like to be of the greatest assistance possible, the other tells people you don't like how they play.
Dit donc camarade soleil / Ne trouves-tu ça pas plutôt con / De donner une journée pareil / À un patron

fodder

QuoteI would like to ask all nobles to pick up the sword again, for we need every knight possible to defend the realm!  Our very existence is at stake!  For <realm>!  For glory!

i'm not even sure about that... as technically the only class that needs to pick a sword is a priest XD

I would say something really simple like "We are severely lacking in men at the walls. Send out the cooks and stablehands!" or some such would be a big enough hint.
firefox

Draco Tanos

Yes, but there are nobles who don't recruit units because they have 'retired' but wish to retain their titles (looking at you, Corwin!).

Chenier

Dit donc camarade soleil / Ne trouves-tu ça pas plutôt con / De donner une journée pareil / À un patron

Vellos

Whatever the case, it at least wouldn't be an immediate, obvious, practically debate-less question for that phrasing.
"A neutral humanism is either a pedantic artifice or a prologue to the inhuman." - George Steiner

Draco Tanos

Quote from: Chénier on January 22, 2013, 01:03:25 PM
I also don't like the "all" part.
So basically, you don't want it to be addressed to a certain person or group, but you don't want it to be addressed to everyone?

* Draco Tanos golf-claps.

Anaris

Quote from: Draco Tanos on January 22, 2013, 07:04:44 PM
So basically, you don't want it to be addressed to a certain person or group, but you don't want it to be addressed to everyone?

* Draco Tanos golf-claps.

Yes, Draco: he wants it to be addressed generally, asking that someone or some few change, not that everyone who can change.

The latter is asking that particular people change their class, too.

It should, in fact, be addressed indeterminately. That's sort of the point: so that no particular person feels that they, specifically, have to do it.
Timothy Collett

"The only thing you can't trade for your heart's desire...is your heart." "You are what you do.  Choose again, and change." "One of these days, someone's gonna plug you, and you're going to die saying, 'What did I say? What did I say?'"  ~ Miles Naismith Vorkosigan

Draco Tanos

Quote from: Anaris on January 22, 2013, 07:11:44 PM
Yes, Draco: he wants it to be addressed generally, asking that someone or some few change, not that everyone who can change.

The latter is asking that particular people change their class, too.

It should, in fact, be addressed indeterminately. That's sort of the point: so that no particular person feels that they, specifically, have to do it.

And in my case in Westmoor, I'd be asking people who are warriors to actually recruit a damned unit as well.

I go on MY personal experience:  There are warriors who don't recruit units.  Period.  Not infies, not traders, warriors outright.

Saying "I would like to ask that someone pick up the sword again" rather than "I would like to ask all nobles to pick up the sword again" would get someone flagged to these very forums because it sounds like a passive-aggressive jab  where as my version literally is directed at everyone.  Not a class, not a specific person, but everyone.