Are you trying to tell me people can have innocent motives in this game? Lies!!
Lies!
And I'm really rushing too much to write my responses... Super busy these days, and then I look back at stuff and I'm like "Okay, did I really say it like that...?"
The way Machiavel sees it, D'Hara and Barca are treaty-bound to protect Chesney. Article C)iii. is clear. There's no article that states anything about a city being uncited should X condition occur. The Old Republic tasked D'Hara and Barca with the protection of their city. If anyone wants to continue the legacy of the Old Republic, than they too must recognize that D'Hara and Barca are tasked with protecting Chesney, and that only an amendment to the treaty can be ratified to remove the citation.
Thus, Phantaria could (via their Diet), among a number of other things, recognize the 'moot's obligations to defend Chesney and ask to be considered as sole legitimate successor to the Old Republic (both go hand in hand), and then ask to join the 'moot and get stewardship of Chesney or ask to terminate their membership in the 'moot and cede stewardship of Chesney. Or think out of the box, and propose something completely different.
But there's so many simultaneous issues that need to be addressed. You can't just pick one issue at a time anymore, a global solution needs to be presented to be voted upon.