Errr... perhaps you could explain?
I think making the names of their accusers available to multi-cheaters is a bad idea. I also think requiring work-arounds like translation machines is foolish, when you could just protect anonymity in the first place, by not revealing the accuser. What is the connection (and I assume contradiction) you are pointing out?
Not revealing the name but leaving a distinctive writing style doesn't protect anonymity. Translation machines would indeed be silly, but posting the full complaint would be a problem (especially since often the information someone would have would be limited to a small number of people, i.e. I could file a complaint with information that only Jenred or maybe three, four other people on the Far East would have access to all of). It'd be simple enough to post a simple version of the complaint that has:
1. The person/people involved.
2. The rule that may have been violated in specific (this capital was moved, that order was given, etc).
Person who makes the complaint could write up this basic summary when reporting easily enough.
