A verdict has been reached, and necessary IG enforcement actions have been taken. For anyone who desires to cite this case in the future, the final verdict was:
"The Magistrates find the defendant guilty of publicly making accusations of cheating with no proof. This is expressly prohibited by the Social Contract. The fact that the message was posed as a question is irrelevant since the question clearly and unambiguously implied the accusation. Accusations of cheating with proof should be passed directly to the Titans or Magistrates and not discussed publicly outside of the Courthouse; multi-cheating accusations should be addressed to the Titans only."
Magistrates voted 5-1 in favor of the guilty verdict, with 4 in favor of a warning and 1 in favor of a 2-day lock. A warning has been issued. This thread will be locked after a few more days.
