It might not require much writing at all, just interpete things wildly differently and expound on how you know what they really mean.
Then you can have people point out that there is nothing in the text which supports these claims and you can claim they are outsiders who never really understood the greater meaning of the religion.
As long as you're an active talker, I don't know how much formal wikiwork is needed. Often I think wikis can get in the way of a real good "Four Legs Good, Two Legs Better" moment. If a religion isn't Orwellian, it's just not trying (as someone who's religion has people's arms torn out of their sockets "as a mercy and kindness to them")