Author Topic: Limiting unjustified diplomatic actions  (Read 11656 times)

De-Legro

  • Honourable King
  • *****
  • Posts: 3838
    • View Profile
Re: Limiting unjustified diplomatic actions
« Reply #15: June 09, 2011, 12:40:16 AM »
Heeheeheehee,
Oh my.  No, Alliances are often with people you -hate-, not even dislike, but hate-hate-hate.  Leave aside the idea that it's a gangbang when GA is winning the war in the south and OW is being absolutely devestated by Arcachon, but OW and Arcachon were long term "allies" who have never been friends per say, but just didn't have a reason to attack each other and so said "Eh, look, we're uh, friends?" while sharpening their knives.

Xarnelf helping Arcachon led to pretty much exactly what OW and Arcaea didn't want from the start, and what Cathay is now desperately trying to avoid, which is another total war in which half of the FEI gets burned to the ground.

If anyone should complain about a potential gangbang it should be Cathay, but they entered the war (second to) last and chose their fate, especially if the wind blows the other way and C'thonia/Kindara shanks them.

This who FEI continent wide war is really even, Arcaea/OW/Cathay start with an edge, but due to their lack of food they effectively have a timer running on their war machine.  It's really exciting.

You realise Arcaea actually produces enough food for their needs these days right? Only just, but if we get bad harvest its just  a matter of rationing. The recent starvations were due to losing a banker at a poor time, not an actual shortage of food.
Previously of the De-Legro Family
Now of representation unknown.