Did you even notice it was in proportionate response to the disgusting suggestion that violating the social contract was a praiseworthy crowning moment of BattleMaster history?
Most of that previous reply was meant to demonstrate the disgust in like proportions to the praise being rendered for violators of the social contract after my more moderate, reasonable response resulted in continued insistence on blaming/not-blaming and effusive praise for poor player behavior.
Did anyone violate the social contract? If so, did you complain to the Titans? If so, what was their verdict?
And even if someone did something wrong, an admin on an internet forum shouldn't be publicly airing his personal bias like this. How can you claim to be unbiased and impartial after this?
Would you still sit down for a board game if the person in charge of explaining the rules calls your past behavior "shameful", "despicable", and "disgusting"?
If you really need to vent, may I suggest making a throwaway account to do so?
