http://wiki.battlemaster.org/wiki/Ethiala#Out_of_Character_Rules
The realm of Ethiala on FEI had a clause at that link. I'll repost it here for those lazy. :P
QuoteEthiala is considered a serious roleplaying realm and so requires that all players choose appropriate names for their characters. At an absolute minimum, characters are required to be aware of the [[Serious Medieval Atmosphere]] guidelines, and are also recommended to familiarize themselves with the [[RP Primer]].
There are no 'RP Police' and only the most blatant out-of-character behavior (such as an inappropriate name) will result in an OOC ban. For everything else, just be aware that advancement is usually rewarded to characters who contribute to the medieval feel of Ethiala.
So, I'm wondering, was this legitimate? Could realms dictate this sort of thing at one time? Could they still with it not being viewed as an OOC Ban abuse?
Does anyone know if they ever actually used such force in-game, or was it a hollow threat?
OOC ban is for cheating or serious abuse of the game. It is not appropriate to OOC ban for a poor name, even on Dwilight. It should be reported to the Titans /Magistrates. I can't see any rule such as this as being legitimate.
I would support what Indirik said.
Such messages could serve as signals to ward off "unserious" players, but could not actually be very much enforced.
The SMA page says this:
QuoteOn any island explicitly marked as one we want to have a serious medieval atmosphere (currently: Dwilight), the above guidelines will be enforced by the ruler of each realm, which means anyone breaking them repeatedly or so blatantly that it hurts the atmosphere will find his character deported to some other random island.
If you believe that someone is failing to follow the guidelines, then you should report them to your ruler, who will take any necessary action. If you believe that the ruler is failing to uphold the guidelines, then you can report him to the Titans if necessary.
An OOC ban would not be appropriate, but the rulers are still expected to enforce the guidelines without recourse to the Magistrates every time. Asking characters with silly names to leave, and deporting/banning them if they won't, is appropriate.
This is about a realm on FEI, not Dwilight. SMA does not apply to FEI.
Quote from: Indirik on February 02, 2013, 01:18:17 PM
This is about a realm on FEI, not Dwilight. SMA does not apply to FEI.
Right, I was refering to this comment:
Quote from: Indirik on February 02, 2013, 05:21:51 AM
It is not appropriate to OOC ban for a poor name, even on Dwilight. It should be reported to the Titans /Magistrates.
On Dwilight, t is up to the ruler to enforce that rule, ideally through IC means. OOC bans are inappropriate, but it should not be automatically reported either.
Of course, you can work with the player to change, if they will. But if you need to escalate the situation, OOC ban is not the right way. Report to the Titans via SMA report. Titans can force deport, Magistrates cannot.
Quote from: Indirik on February 02, 2013, 01:48:20 PM
Of course, you can work with the player to change, if they will. But if you need to escalate the situation, OOC ban is not the right way. Report to the Titans via SMA report. Titans can force deport, Magistrates cannot.
Oh, that's what is meant by deport? I took it as ban/arrest/deport. Ok then, my bad.
Waaay back at the beginning of the FEI, many realms had an official policy along the lines of "You must roleplay within a certain (reasonable) time after you arrive, or you will be OOC banned." This was seen as normal and appropriate at the time.
Times change. The OOC ban is no longer a particularly effective tool for...well, much of anything, and the FEI has long since lost its official "RP Island" descriptor.
I don't remember how long ago Ethiala was born or died, but my guess would be they were taking their cue from that.
If they're quoting SMA, this had to be late 2008, or later.
Quote from: Indirik on February 02, 2013, 03:06:18 PM
If they're quoting SMA, this had to be late 2008, or later.
Dwilight opened early 2008. Alanna arrived there on 11 January, and turns started running a few days to a week later.
Ok, then early 2008. But still, that sets the period when SMA started.
On Dwi, the ruler was expected to enforce SMA... the OOC ban is the only tool a ruler has. If it was desired that he be banned, then we'd have said it was the judge's job, not the ruler's. I believe OOC bans were given on multiple occasions for players who refused to change their inappropriate names. On Dwi, however.
Nobody has the right to make up OOC rules, so whether it was fine or not on Dwi, certainly wouldn't have been on FEI.
It is appropriate to fine/IC ban/etc someone whose IC actions are unacceptable. Simply make an IC rule about showing deference or using appropriate address or whatever.
... someone could just update the wiki... especially the titan bit. (heck.. i ooc banned someone with a all caps name back then... when he tried to run to a different realm when told to change name.)
I think I put that in during my tenure as Ethiala's ruler, or else I induced somebody else to. I don't think I made up the idea though (since we don't have any such rule for Cathay, even though we still label ourselves an 'RP' realm). too lazy to check the wiki to see if I actually added the edit.
I vaguely recall a conversation on the OOC ban among the Titans back in '06 or '07 in which it was mentioned that someone who had an inappropriate name (like, an obviously bad name, not just a 'not great RP name') could/should be OOC banned if they refused to do anything about it.
The in-game OOC ban page itself still says this:
'On the Far-East Island, you are allowed to ban people for repeatedly and consistently refusing to roleplay.'
Ha.
As for the SMA reference, if I did indeed have anything to do with that it would be SMA as it seemed at the time, not SMA as it actually turned out, so that reference is pretty meaningless. In Cathay I try to make a 'serious medieval atmosphere' (lowercase) happen but I don't ever reference SMA.