BattleMaster Community

BattleMaster => Case Archives => Magistrates Case Archive => Topic started by: BattleMaster Server on May 16, 2012, 06:54:06 PM

Title: Failure to abide by Magistrate verdict
Post by: BattleMaster Server on May 16, 2012, 06:54:06 PM
Summary:Failure to abide by Magistrate verdict
Violation:Clause 2: Fair Play (Original Judgement)
World:East Continent
Complainer:Ryan Baldock (http://battlemaster.org/UserDetails.php?ID=32345)
About:Joseph Lant (http://battlemaster.org/UserDetails.php?ID=30651)

Full Complaint Text:


   (This petition has multiple defendants as identified in the  "Fontan deportee returns"thread in the Magistrates Q&A forum - the second here is the player of the Cordon-D'Anerville family, ID is 29103.)
 
   
 
   As identified by the player of the Dragul family, and Peter (aka Foundation on the forums) in the previously mentioned thread, the defendants have returned to their points of origin after a magistrate judgement was enforced against them due to being in violation of Clause 2 of the Social Contract regarding fair play and being in a group of players which did not invest in a constructive gaming community, as found by a Dev Team investigation as well as discussion and judgement by the Magistrates.
 
   
 
   When the original case was brought by Tom, he proposed the following in his original complaint:
 
   
 
   "I propose to break up the clan by deporting a randomly selected half of their members from both realms to randomly selected other islands, where they can then join realms of their own choice. I also propose to prohibit them from re-forming within the same realm at a size of more than one third of the number of characters in those realms for the period of one year."
 
   
 
   While there was no explicit mention of this in the original judgement of the Magistrates, it should be noted that both players have returned to their point of origin after the minimum length of time possible as per the game mechanics regarding emigration allows for. As such, it is felt that both players are openly defying the verdict in the original case.
 
   
 
   With that in mind, I ask that the Magistrates look again at the punishment handed out and consider whether any additional sanctions need to be carried out. There is precedent for this, as noted in the second case against the player of the Orton family and failure to disband militia completely after an initial Magistrate verdict on the matter.
 
   
 
   


Title: Re: Failure to abide by Magistrate verdict
Post by: Chaotrance13 on May 16, 2012, 07:06:22 PM
Addendum:

Posts detailing evidence of the "minimum time required" portion of the complaint are here:
Post #1 (Player from Fontan) (http://forum.battlemaster.org/index.php/topic,2474.msg56034.html#msg56034)
Post #2 (Player from Aurvandil) (http://forum.battlemaster.org/index.php/topic,2474.msg56043.html#msg56043)

I should also note that in the original discussion, it was in fact Velax who pointed out that one of the defendants had returned, not Katayanna. My apologies to Velax for that error.
Title: Re: Failure to abide by Magistrate verdict
Post by: DamnTaffer on May 17, 2012, 12:16:35 AM
I would as a side note like to know how Velax found this information out? I quite doubt it was discovered from daily refreshing all the profiles of the deported saxons to see if they'd moved
Title: Re: Failure to abide by Magistrate verdict
Post by: Gustav Kuriga on May 17, 2012, 02:02:39 AM
I would as a side note like to know how Velax found this information out? I quite doubt it was discovered from daily refreshing all the profiles of the deported saxons to see if they'd moved

Well duh. He'd know who to look out for because he saw them get booted out of his own realm. So he just saw the name, and went to the profile. It's relatively simple.
Title: Re: Failure to abide by Magistrate verdict
Post by: Velax on May 17, 2012, 03:33:47 AM
I would as a side note like to know how Velax found this information out? I quite doubt it was discovered from daily refreshing all the profiles of the deported saxons to see if they'd moved

Not really sure how that's relevant, to be honest, but one of the deportees ended up in my realm on FEI. He made no effort whatsoever to integrate, never sent a single message that I saw, ignored all the messages I sent him, never moved outside the capital and then left back to EC. I assumed he would be returning to Fontan and I was not proved wrong.
Title: Re: Failure to abide by Magistrate verdict
Post by: Tom on May 17, 2012, 11:03:22 AM
Not really sure how that's relevant, to be honest, but one of the deportees ended up in my realm on FEI. He made no effort whatsoever to integrate, never sent a single message that I saw, ignored all the messages I sent him, never moved outside the capital and then left back to EC. I assumed he would be returning to Fontan and I was not proved wrong.

Yes, that is relevant information. It strongly supports the original verdict that these players are playing as a clan and don't give a flying !@#$ about the rest of the BM community or game.

Title: Re: Failure to abide by Magistrate verdict
Post by: vonGenf on May 17, 2012, 12:02:19 PM
I also propose to prohibit them from re-forming within the same realm at a size of more than one third of the number of characters in those realms for the period of one year.

Are they currently in breach of that part of the judgment?
Title: Re: Failure to abide by Magistrate verdict
Post by: Kellaine on May 17, 2012, 01:05:25 PM
not that it matters, but the rest of the clan members all auto paused tonight at the same time or at least 8 of them did.

Lord paused   (4 hours ago)
Mozny Radziwilzl' (Lord) has been auto-paused due to inactivity.

Knight paused   (4 hours ago)
Yvonne Peugeot (Dame of Negev) has been auto-paused due to inactivity.

Knight paused   (4 hours ago)
Druhtinaz Vanimedle' (Knight of Oporto) has been auto-paused due to inactivity.

Noble paused   (4 hours ago)
Corvian Stratharch (Noble) has been auto-paused due to inactivity.

Noble paused   (4 hours ago)
Tervius Stratharch (Noble) has been auto-paused due to inactivity.

Noble paused   (4 hours ago)
James Hind the Highwayman (Noble) has been auto-paused due to inactivity.

Noble paused   (4 hours ago)
Nilos Radziwilzl' (Noble) has been auto-paused due to inactivity.

Noble paused   (4 hours ago)
Claude Duval the Highwayman (Noble) has been auto-paused due to inactivity.
Title: Re: Failure to abide by Magistrate verdict
Post by: Chaotrance13 on May 17, 2012, 04:08:23 PM
Are they currently in breach of that part of the judgment?

As I said in my complaint - that was a suggestion by Tom in the case dealing with the clan in the first instance. It wasn't referred to in the actual Magistrate judgement, so I don't know if it was imposed at all. However, as this case is now under review, it may be taken into consideration, it may not. That's up to the Magistrates as we both know.

If that were to be considered, they'd not be in total breach, in all honesty. They'd be in breach of the time requirement but not the "numbers" requirement (the whole thing about 1/3rd and such). But that's more of a hypothetical and, of course, that is prohibited when discussing cases.

Title: Re: Failure to abide by Magistrate verdict
Post by: Velax on May 17, 2012, 04:30:20 PM
The Magistrate decision did say: "The goal of this unusual action is to compel the members of this clan to try playing the game separately, as individuals, rather than as a collective that plays the game primarily as a group. As it is their collectivist approach to conflict and power that creates the violations that we have determined exist, we believe that this is the best option to correct the situation and it is our hope that these players can learn to enjoy the game as it was meant to be."

The entire point of the punishment was to separate this clan. They would have been well aware of that when they were punished but at least one or two chose to disregard it completely, making no effort whatsoever to play with anyone other than their clan mates.
Title: Re: Failure to abide by Magistrate verdict
Post by: Chaotrance13 on May 17, 2012, 04:50:40 PM
The Magistrate decision did say: "The goal of this unusual action is to compel the members of this clan to try playing the game separately, as individuals, rather than as a collective that plays the game primarily as a group. As it is their collectivist approach to conflict and power that creates the violations that we have determined exist, we believe that this is the best option to correct the situation and it is our hope that these players can learn to enjoy the game as it was meant to be."

The entire point of the punishment was to separate this clan. They would have been well aware of that when they were punished but at least one or two chose to disregard it completely, making no effort whatsoever to play with anyone other than their clan mates.

Indeed, this is why I started the case - the fact that two players have chosen to disregard the original decision and certainly the spirit of it as well by choosing to return to Fontan/Aurvandil after the minimum amount of time spent on other islands. Added to that, it has been stated now at least one of these players made no active engagement on their new island (FEI in this case) with other players after being forcibly deported. Of course, that can be proven by a member of the Dev Team if they so wish it as well.
Title: Re: Failure to abide by Magistrate verdict
Post by: DamnTaffer on May 18, 2012, 01:04:29 AM
Yes, that is relevant information. It strongly supports the original verdict that these players are playing as a clan and don't give a flying !@#$ about the rest of the BM community or game.

It strongly supports the original verdict that THESE TWO players are playing as a clan and don't give a flying !@#$ about the rest of the bm community or the game

Title: Re: Failure to abide by Magistrate verdict
Post by: Indirik on May 18, 2012, 01:14:17 AM
Did anyone ever check to see if those who were deported simply created new characters in the realms from which they were deported?
Title: Re: Failure to abide by Magistrate verdict
Post by: Vellos on May 18, 2012, 01:20:21 AM
Doesn't look to be the case. I don't know the complete final list of deported accounts, but the set I looked through seemed like mostly they either paused their whole account (sad but not shocking), moved back (annoying and unacceptable), or started new characters in totally new places (wonderful!).
Title: Re: Failure to abide by Magistrate verdict
Post by: Indirik on May 18, 2012, 01:22:59 AM
Any rash of new accounts in the two realms affected?
Title: Re: Failure to abide by Magistrate verdict
Post by: Kellaine on May 18, 2012, 02:42:28 AM
Any rash of new accounts in the two realms affected?

Not in Fontan, but they know that Fontan is about dead and may go some place else.
Title: Re: Failure to abide by Magistrate verdict
Post by: DamnTaffer on May 18, 2012, 08:52:38 AM
Any rash of new accounts in the two realms affected?

Not in Aurvandil
Title: Re: Failure to abide by Magistrate verdict
Post by: Vellos on May 18, 2012, 03:38:14 PM
Any rash of new accounts in the two realms affected?

Aurvandil does have a sudden uptick shortly after the enforcement of the verdict; but I dunno where those accounts originate from, and I'm dreading the idea of dredging through all those (remarkably identical!) accounts again. Please don't make me do it Indirik. Please. Have mercy on a poor boy.
Title: Re: Failure to abide by Magistrate verdict
Post by: DamnTaffer on May 18, 2012, 03:41:38 PM
Aurvandil does have a sudden uptick shortly after the enforcement of the verdict; but I dunno where those accounts originate from, and I'm dreading the idea of dredging through all those (remarkably identical!) accounts again. Please don't make me do it Indirik. Please. Have mercy on a poor boy.

I think those were fleeing Barcans, and we had 2 accounts unpause + 3 new nobles from pre existing accounts but no torrent of new accounts or anything like that
Title: Re: Failure to abide by Magistrate verdict
Post by: Vellos on May 18, 2012, 04:59:36 PM
I think those were fleeing Barcans, and we had 2 accounts unpause + 3 new nobles from pre existing accounts but no torrent of new accounts or anything like that

No, I don't mean the spike beginning May 6. I mean the spike beginning April 24, right after the deportations.

But, again, I dunno where those accounts came from.
Title: Re: Failure to abide by Magistrate verdict
Post by: Indirik on May 18, 2012, 05:49:36 PM
Well, we have seen in the past that certain groups were quite willing to abandon accounts and just make new ones...
Title: Re: Failure to abide by Magistrate verdict
Post by: DamnTaffer on May 18, 2012, 07:01:08 PM
No, I don't mean the spike beginning May 6. I mean the spike beginning April 24, right after the deportations.

But, again, I dunno where those accounts came from.

I count 1 new account and one unpaused character from near that time and one of those paused again quickly after, though I could be wrong from trying go through my messages counting the new player messages
Title: Re: Failure to abide by Magistrate verdict
Post by: DoctorHarte on May 19, 2012, 01:35:21 AM
not that it matters, but the rest of the clan members all auto paused tonight at the same time or at least 8 of them did.


Knight paused   (4 hours ago)
Yvonne Peugeot (Dame of Negev) has been auto-paused due to inactivity.


This player I know in Real Life, he isn't a clanner. Please don't assume that all the auto-paused characters are "clanners". That's just nonsense.

Title: Re: Failure to abide by Magistrate verdict
Post by: Kellaine on May 19, 2012, 02:08:38 AM
This player I know in Real Life, he isn't a clanner. Please don't assume that all the auto-paused characters are "clanners". That's just nonsense.

My apologies. 
Title: Re: Failure to abide by Magistrate verdict
Post by: Chaotrance13 on May 19, 2012, 07:51:30 PM
Well, we have seen in the past that certain groups were quite willing to abandon accounts and just make new ones...

Indeed, that is a likely outcome. But if I may, can I bring the focus back to these two players who have flouted the initial decision regarding the clan in Fontan/Aurvandil? I'm assuming that the Magistrates are discussing this in the backroom?
Title: Re: Failure to abide by Magistrate verdict
Post by: Indirik on May 19, 2012, 08:18:35 PM
That's a good question. Perhaps one of them would care to comment?
Title: Re: Failure to abide by Magistrate verdict
Post by: Indirik on May 19, 2012, 08:46:51 PM
is there some reason you can't just open it yourself...?
Title: Re: Failure to abide by Magistrate verdict
Post by: ^ban^ on May 20, 2012, 09:56:07 AM
Hi there. I've done some moderation. Please don't make me do any more. Back on topic, please.
Title: Re: Failure to abide by Magistrate verdict
Post by: Reece on May 20, 2012, 09:58:52 AM
The reason I returned to Dwilight is quite simple, Dwilight is the most interesting continent to play on and the only one I have a real character reason to be there. Atamara is a dead end by comparison, possibly the most boringly stagnant of all the continents. If I knew I was going to be taken for the chop I'd have happily stepped out from Fontan and East Continent and saved some of the others ( I can't recall who had the Enobled-Advy deported at the moment, but he'd been in the realm for well over 1000 days so I find it hard to see why he would be picked )

Anyway, If needs be I'll just make it easy for you and leave the game, because if I can't play where I would like to with the IC. backstory and RP. cause on specific characters then there is really no reason at all to play. I would like to be able to play Dwilight though if that is at all possible.

:-: This isn't a bugtracker I know but as a PS. you might like to know after Cold Storage I still have access and can send messages from Nathanial, which I assume isn't meant to happen.

Moderator note: If you find a bug please report them it to the tracker. Commenting about a bug here wont accomplish anything because there's no way to track it.
Title: Re: Failure to abide by Magistrate verdict
Post by: ^ban^ on May 20, 2012, 10:06:26 AM
Remain on topic. This applies to everyone.

I hate doing moderation: don't make me do it. You wouldn't like me when I'm angry.
Title: Re: Failure to abide by Magistrate verdict
Post by: Fury on May 20, 2012, 01:09:59 PM
A couple more preposterous comments have also been moderated.
Title: Re: Failure to abide by Magistrate verdict
Post by: Chaotrance13 on May 20, 2012, 03:00:29 PM
The reason I returned to Dwilight is quite simple, Dwilight is the most interesting continent to play on and the only one I have a real character reason to be there. Atamara is a dead end by comparison, possibly the most boringly stagnant of all the continents. If I knew I was going to be taken for the chop I'd have happily stepped out from Fontan and East Continent and saved some of the others ( I can't recall who had the Enobled-Advy deported at the moment, but he'd been in the realm for well over 1000 days so I find it hard to see why he would be picked )

Anyway, If needs be I'll just make it easy for you and leave the game, because if I can't play where I would like to with the IC. backstory and RP. cause on specific characters then there is really no reason at all to play. I would like to be able to play Dwilight though if that is at all possible.

:-: This isn't a bugtracker I know but as a PS. you might like to know after Cold Storage I still have access and can send messages from Nathanial, which I assume isn't meant to happen.

Moderator note: If you find a bug please report them it to the tracker. Commenting about a bug here wont accomplish anything because there's no way to track it.

If you feel that way, then in all honesty I believe you should have appealed the verdict (specifically, your selection at random) to Tom directly before moving. Instead, because you didn't, you breached the judgment and other players spotted it. I am sure if you had asked Tom directly that you wished to return and gave a solid argument for doing so, he'd have considered it. Whether he accepted or or rejected it is a different matter, but he's not unreasonable.
Title: Re: Failure to abide by Magistrate verdict
Post by: Geronus on May 22, 2012, 07:02:57 PM
The reason I returned to Dwilight is quite simple, Dwilight is the most interesting continent to play on and the only one I have a real character reason to be there. Atamara is a dead end by comparison, possibly the most boringly stagnant of all the continents. If I knew I was going to be taken for the chop I'd have happily stepped out from Fontan and East Continent and saved some of the others ( I can't recall who had the Enobled-Advy deported at the moment, but he'd been in the realm for well over 1000 days so I find it hard to see why he would be picked )

Anyway, If needs be I'll just make it easy for you and leave the game, because if I can't play where I would like to with the IC. backstory and RP. cause on specific characters then there is really no reason at all to play. I would like to be able to play Dwilight though if that is at all possible.

:-: This isn't a bugtracker I know but as a PS. you might like to know after Cold Storage I still have access and can send messages from Nathanial, which I assume isn't meant to happen.

Moderator note: If you find a bug please report them it to the tracker. Commenting about a bug here wont accomplish anything because there's no way to track it.

Have you considered playing somewhere else on Dwilight, preferably somewhere not right next to Aurvandil? The whole point of this exercise was to express our desire to see you and the others who were deported not always play in the same realm with the same particular group of families who have come to our attention time and time again. That desire would be satisfied by seeing you play somewhere away from Aurvandil. Preferably far away.

May I also point out that virtually any other island is more exciting than Atamara, not just Dwilight. Why not give BT a try? If you're a sucker for fights against long odds, Overlord has about 24kCS of daimons in Qual awaiting your heroics. It shouldn't be the case that the only way you can have fun playing BM is when you're with the same specific group of people all the time.
Title: Re: Failure to abide by Magistrate verdict
Post by: Velax on May 27, 2012, 08:45:19 AM
Soooooo...did anything happen with this?
Title: Re: Failure to abide by Magistrate verdict
Post by: Geronus on May 27, 2012, 03:57:48 PM
Yes. And no. We actually made a decision, but we need help from the Dev team to enforce it.
Title: Re: Failure to abide by Magistrate verdict
Post by: Anaris on May 27, 2012, 05:08:58 PM
Yes. And no. We actually made a decision, but we need help from the Dev team to enforce it.

That's all very well, but to the best of my knowledge, the dev team has not actually been informed of this.

That's sort of important if you want our help.
Title: Re: Failure to abide by Magistrate verdict
Post by: Geronus on May 27, 2012, 06:10:53 PM
That's all very well, but to the best of my knowledge, the dev team has not actually been informed of this.

That's sort of important if you want our help.

I know, I'm not casting blame or anything. The Backroom subforum doesn't say 'New' when a poll finishes, so I sort of just realized it myself.
Title: Re: Failure to abide by Magistrate verdict
Post by: Vellos on May 27, 2012, 08:45:56 PM
A verdict has been reached, and IG enforcement actions have been made. For anyone who desires to cite this case in the future, the final verdict was:

"As Joseph Lant has chosen to violate the clear intent of the previous Magistrate ruling relating to him, which flouts the community standards set in the Social Contract, the Magistrates have elected to continue deporting the characters in question.

"The goal of this unusual action is to compel the members of this clan to try playing the game separately, as individuals, rather than as a collective that plays the game primarily as a group. As it is their collectivist approach to conflict and power that creates the violations that we have determined exist, we believe that this is the best option to correct the situation and it is our hope that these players can learn to enjoy the game as it was meant to be. Further violations of this decision will result in further punishment. "

Magistrates voted 6-0 in favor of a guilty verdict, and 4-1-1 in favor of re-deportation (1 for permanent lock, 1 for 3-day lock).

This thread is locked. If you wish to continue debating the issue, it can be done elsewhere. If you have questions for the Magistrates, please take it to the Q&A forum.