BattleMaster Community

BattleMaster => Case Archives => Magistrates Case Archive => Topic started by: BattleMaster Server on December 21, 2012, 03:09:17 PM

Title: Accusations of abuse and general harassment
Post by: BattleMaster Server on December 21, 2012, 03:09:17 PM
Summary:Accusations of abuse and general harassment
Violation:Fair play
World:Atamara
Complainer:Aaron Champion (http://battlemaster.org/UserDetails.php?ID=31496)
About:Enri (http://battlemaster.org/UserDetails.php?ID=19068)

Full Complaint Text:
This is so stupid that I'm angry it even needs to be done. Since joining Caligan Empire, I've been on the receiving end of public OOC accusations of spying and private accusations of abuse and unsportsmanlike behavior from a single individual. Contrary to all evidence, he continues to persist in poisoning the atmosphere of a realm against me that I specifically joined for its team-friendly vibe. I don't really care that he's deeply misguided. I care that he's pressing this matter publicly, privately, IC and OOC, and I'd like it to stop. Asking him apparently doesn't work, so here we are. Below is the full correspondence between us. If a ruling on this specific issue is found to be unwarranted, then I ask the Magistrates to consider opining on what Fair Play means in general. Thanks.


   


      Out-of-Character from Remi Solari   (8 days, 15 hours ago)

      Message sent to everyone in your realm (66 recipients)

      Always said I was going to create a character here some day. Well, now you're stuck with me. My condolences.

      Aaron Champion


      ----


      Out-of-Character from Enri Kinsey   (8 days, 7 hours ago)

      Message sent to everyone in your realm (66 recipients)

      Well well well, the Great House Solari came to spy on us in person! This is quite an honor! Normally we'd qualify for a minor retainer at most!


      I'm watching you. *stares* -|~~ -|~~ -|~~


      (Those are supposed to be daggers by the way.)


      ----


      Out-of-Character from Remi Solari   (8 days ago)

      (Personal message to Enri Kinsey)

      You may not know this, but I really have been wanting to play on the same "team" as you for awhile. I appreciate your command style and thorough planning. I really did apply much of what I gleaned from Enri's strategizing and orders in Thalmarkin. I'm looking forward to this!


      ----


      Out-of-Character from Enri Kinsey   (7 days, 5 hours ago)

      I have good reason to suspect that you recruited new players into the game just so that you could spy on CE. That's not against the rules, but in my humble opinion that is not very sporting.


      ----


      Out-of-Character from Remi Solari   (6 days, 23 hours ago)

      (Personal message to Enri Kinsey)

      I'm afraid that's simply not true, but I'd be happy to tell you exactly how I was able to learn so much.


      ----


      Out-of-Character from Enri Kinsey   (6 days, 7 hours ago)

      Allow me to rephrase: You picked new players who recently joined the game, and bribed them into making characters in CE and spying on us. It's still not sporting.

      Yangfan Wang


      ----


      Out-of-Character from Remi Solari   (4 days, 21 hours ago)

      (Personal message to Enri Kinsey)

      The bulk of intel came from characters of good standing in the realm. Else how would Enri's deliberations with the marshals have been obtained? I can appreciate your point of view, and I've come to agree with parts of it. That's why I don't bother with spying, and haven't since leaving Carelia. Despite what you might think, and certainly despite what your character in D'Hara thinks. It's time-consuming and unfair to others. But sporting? Come on. We're both competitive, and have gone to great lengths for our "teams". You exploit an advantage where it can be found, particularly when you're so mismatched conventionally.


      ----


      Out-of-Character from Enri Kinsey   (4 days, 14 hours ago)

      Yes, because CE and Carelia & Co. was so "mismatched" at the beginning of the war. Spying is a tool that you always deployed, not something that you reserved for desperate situations.


      There is a difference between competitiveness and bad sportsmanship. There is a difference between playing well and taking unfair advantages over others. There is a difference between obeying both the spirit and the letter of the rules, and skirting around the edges and rules-lawyering. Like, oh, say, claiming that you are not realm-merging because there was still that lone stronghold left out in the middle of nowhere, and then throwing its duke under the proverbial bus when he merged with a neighbor. Was it against the rules? Technically, no. Was it a dick move that would have made Machiavelli blush? Yes.


      This is supposed to be a friendly game. I find it sad and pathetic the lengths that some players, including Devs, will go to try to "win" unfairly. Sometimes they fall flat on their face anyways. I do get some schadenfreude from

Title: Re: Accusations of abuse and general harassment
Post by: Solari on December 21, 2012, 03:11:10 PM
Correspondence was cut off. Here's the rest:

Quote
Out-of-Character from Enri Kinsey   (4 days, 14 hours ago)
Yes, because CE and Carelia & Co. was so "mismatched" at the beginning of the war. Spying is a tool that you always deployed, not something that you reserved for desperate situations.

There is a difference between competitiveness and bad sportsmanship. There is a difference between playing well and taking unfair advantages over others. There is a difference between obeying both the spirit and the letter of the rules, and skirting around the edges and rules-lawyering. Like, oh, say, claiming that you are not realm-merging because there was still that lone stronghold left out in the middle of nowhere, and then throwing its duke under the proverbial bus when he merged with a neighbor. Was it against the rules? Technically, no. Was it a dick move that would have made Machiavelli blush? Yes.

This is supposed to be a friendly game. I find it sad and pathetic the lengths that some players, including Devs, will go to try to "win" unfairly. Sometimes they fall flat on their face anyways. I do get some schadenfreude from that.

"That's why I don't bother with spying, and haven't since leaving Carelia. Despite what you might think, and certainly despite what your character in D'Hara thinks."

... I have a theory about spying: You don't really need to gather intel using the old-fashioned ways anymore.  It makes you out of practice. You are a really bad liar, you know?

I'm not really interested in anything that you have to say at this point.
Yangfan Wang



Quote
Out-of-Character from Remi Solari   (4 days, 11 hours ago)
(Personal message to Enri Kinsey)
I'm very sorry you feel the way you do. Your impression of who I am and how I play is wildly inaccurate, but I can respect your wishes. I joined CE to have fun in a team-centric realm. I'm sure you'll demonstrate the same sportsmanship you so easily accuse me of lacking by not allowing your OOC opinions to impact my IC experience. Hopefully, with time, you'll come to realize how silly you're being.


Quote
Out-of-Character from Remi Solari   (1 day, 1 hour ago)
(Personal message to Enri Kinsey)
I'm happy to indulge you so that you never actually have to interact with me, but if you continue to abuse the social contract by acting out your silly, ill-informed OOC agenda against my character by condemning him to a purgatory of inactivity, I will escalate the matter, and you will lose badly. I cannot express strongly enough how wrong you are on every point. I came to CE to play on your team. You need to accept it and put on your big boy pants. Your choice.


Quote
Out-of-Character from Enri Kinsey   (7 hours, 8 minutes ago)
Message sent to everyone in your realm (67 recipients)
Out-of-Character from Remi Solari   (17 hours, 46 minutes ago)
I'm happy to indulge you so that you never actually have to interact with me, but if you continue to abuse the social contract by acting out your silly, ill-informed OOC agenda against my character by condemning him to a purgatory of inactivity, I will escalate the matter, and you will lose badly. I cannot express strongly enough how wrong you are on every point. I came to CE to play on your team. You need to accept it and put on your big boy pants. Your choice.
Aaron Champion

I'm not sure that I understand. Enri gave Remi the same orders that he gave to Duke Celestial. Are you saying that the assignment is not befitting your newly minted knight, even though it's acceptable to a Duke? Is Remi too good to command an escort unit for his liege? I'm sorry, but some missions are boring yet necessary. If I wait around for volunteers, they'll never get done.

What is against the rules is threatening to "escalate the matter" in order to try to get your way. But you knew that.



Quote
Out-of-Character from Remi Solari   (23 minutes ago)
Message sent to everyone in your realm (67 recipients)
Would you really like your private OOC letters to me shared with the realm, Yangfan? Are you that stupid? Or would you prefer to go back to pretending like you have a solid IC reason for for harassing behavior?

I'm going to continue playing as though I'm welcome here. Part of a team. You could at least indulge this fantasy by practicing the "sportsmanship" that you lectured me about. Fair enough?


Quote
Out-of-Character from Remi Solari   (14 minutes ago)
Message sent to everyone in your realm (67 recipients)
For clarity's sake—and this is really the last thing I'm going to say OOC in public—the "escalation" that I mentioned and that the player of Enri refers to is this:

Request from Remi Solari   (1 day ago)
Message sent to: Celestial Fury, Enri Kinsey
Awaiting orders.

(OOC: I'll do this every day until you grow up, Yangfan.)

Letter from Remi Solari   (20 hours ago)
Message sent to: Celestial Fury, Enri Kinsey
Thank you, Your Grace. General Enri, do you in fact have other orders at this time?


Request from Remi Solari   (9 hours, 53 minutes ago)
(Personal message to Enri Kinsey)
General Enri—

As I am ever early to rise, I wish to inquire about the latest orders in advance of sunrise.

I wasn't aware that asking for orders every turn was so threatening. Can we get back to playing a game now?
Title: Re: Accusations of abuse and general harassment
Post by: Solari on December 21, 2012, 03:39:15 PM
All the stuff concerning the special assignment for Remi at the southern end of the realm by the General after being told to recruit and then assigned to a campaigning army.


Quote
Letter from Celestial Fury   (7 days, 23 hours ago)

Will you be choosing the path of the warrior? Let me know if you have an army in mind or I shall assign you to the FoEL by Nidan tradition.

The Lightning Griffins take in mostly Cavalry. The Est Sularus oth Mithas is based on one of the earliest surviving guilds in the Empire. The Eaglin Eagles, Pax Cagila & Calis Lions have roots in their respective linked-cities. The Fyrd of Ered Luin is the homeland army but has now been roped in for offensive operations.

Army Sponsor Marshal
Eaglin Eagles Archymond Paxwax Virgo Blue Star
Fyrd of Ered Luin Salvador Zond Celestial Fury
Est Sularus oth Mithas Milan Prestongreen Charles Elegant
Lightning Griffins Archymond Paxwax Archymond Paxwax
Pax Cagila Milan Prestongreen Mizuhiro Ishida
Calis Lions Salvador Zond Enri Kinsey

----

Letter from Remi Solari   (7 days, 19 hours ago)
(Personal message to Celestial Fury)
If you will allow me the honor, I'd like to campaign under the banner of Est Sularus oth Mithas.

----

Report from Remi Solari   (7 days, 17 hours ago)
Message sent to: Aknar Frendrin, Charles Elegant
Commanders—

It is my privilege and honor to report that my liege, the Duke of Nida, has granted me leave to campaign with your army. I am leaving Nida for Cagil now and eagerly await your orders.

In arms,
Remi Solari
Knight of Nida

Orders from Enri Kinsey   (5 days, 14 hours ago)
Message sent to: Celestial Fury, Remi Solari
Sir Remi,

I consider it good manners to announce yourself when you first join a realm.

Your liege is in Skalk. Please join him there, and accompany him on his patrols in southern CE.
Sir Enri Kinsey
General of Cagilan Empire
Knight of Ravening

----

Report from Remi Solari   (4 days, 11 hours ago)
(Personal message to Celestial Fury)
My lord—

Having recruited, I am now leaving the capital to rejoin you as per the General's admittedly unusual orders. Shall I meet you in Skalk?

----

Letter from Celestial Fury   (4 days, 4 hours ago)

Sir Remi,

I'm currently in Nida and shall remain here until rogues show up nearby.
Celestial Fury

----

Report from Remi Solari   (1 day, 18 hours ago)
Message sent to: Celestial Fury, Enri Kinsey
At the General's order, I have arrived in Nida and am reporting for duty.

----

Orders from Celestial Fury   (23 hours, 52 minutes ago)
Message sent to: Enri Kinsey, Remi Solari

Sir Remi,

I usually sit in a city until either:
rogues come up OR
region stats go down

Then I ride out into the sunrise / sunset.

You may follow these orders unless General Enri has others.

----

Orders from Enri Kinsey   (7 hours, 28 minutes ago)
Message sent to: Celestial Fury, Remi Solari

Sir Remi,

Your last orders were to join your liege in Skalk. He is still there. Are you in Skalk yet? No, you are not. You are in Nida. Please move to either Alatol or Garnagi, and then forward into Skalk.

You are to stick close to your liege unless ordered otherwise by him or me. Duke Celestial is responsible for patrolling our southern regions, but he is but one man, and cannot be everywhere at once. You can help by suppressing the smaller rogue infestations by yourself, and joining forces with your liege to attack any large rogue infestations that spring up.

----

Orders from Enri Kinsey   (6 hours, 35 minutes ago)
Message sent to everyone in your realm (67 recipients)

Those in Anost already have their orders.

Courtiers should be on the look-out for regions that might need your assistance.

Lord Garro, please keep raising militia in Eagle's Glen. What we currently have in the region is not enough. Please let me know if you run out of funds.

Duke Celestial, Sir Remi, please keep southern CE free of rogue forces. Sir Remi, I want you to stick close to your liege.

----

Letter from Remi Solari   (59 minutes ago)
Message sent to: Celestial Fury, Enri Kinsey
My apologies, General Enri. The last letter I received from my liege intimated that he was in Nida and not Skalk. Fortunately, I shall be able to ride out and meet him in Garnagi. Thank you for the opportunity to assist in what way I can.
Title: Re: Accusations of abuse and general harassment
Post by: DamnTaffer on December 21, 2012, 03:45:53 PM
Social Contract - The main basis of the rules that all players must agree to. One account only.
Play fairly, as with friends
Always give newcomers the benefit of the doubt.
Keep other peoples' personal information personal.
Do not publicly accuse anyone of cheating, abuses or violations of this contract without proof or evidence.

So Solari is being accused of not playing fairly and no evidence was provided?
 
Title: Re: Accusations of abuse and general harassment
Post by: Anaris on December 21, 2012, 03:47:37 PM
It seems to me that he is being harassed due to an OOC perception on the part of Yangfan Wang that he is abusing his position as a dev to get an advantage in the game. That's not playing as with friends.
Title: Re: Accusations of abuse and general harassment
Post by: Sacha on December 21, 2012, 05:00:37 PM
Sheesh, you'd think a Lurian could stomach the OOC grief ::)
Title: Re: Accusations of abuse and general harassment
Post by: Vellos on December 21, 2012, 07:04:21 PM
It does also appear to me that the player of Enri publicly accused him of cheating (without evidence), and furthermore is not playing as a friend.

HOWEVER– I am disinclined to take the odd assignment as meaningful evidence. Personally, I think it makes complete IC sense to send the cousin/nephew/brother/whatever of a former enemy to some kind of non-front-line duty for a while so you can keep an eye on him and make sure he doesn't do anything damaging. Especially an older player who's been around the block shouldn't be too heavily turned off by that IN AND OF ITSELF.

To me, though, the messages supplied indicate that order may have very little to do with such an IC motivation, and seem fairly clearly predicated an an OOC vendetta. Thus, while it COULD have been a novel (and really very amusing) power struggle of sorts, the OOC threatening and communication to me does seem to suggest unfair play and misconduct.

But I'd like to hear from the accused player as well. I hope somebody will notify him?
Title: Re: Accusations of abuse and general harassment
Post by: Indirik on December 21, 2012, 07:19:57 PM
Reporting a magistrates case automatically sends the "accused" a log-in message informing them of the fact, and directing them to the forums to participate in the case.
Title: Re: Accusations of abuse and general harassment
Post by: Bedwyr on December 21, 2012, 09:01:24 PM
That's pretty severe harassment and major Social Contract violation, from what Solari posted.  The only thing I have to add is about the "threatening to escalate" bit.  Given the circumstances, I would say it was a quite restrained response, but that's skirting awfully close to the "not threatening to go to the Titans" rule, which I presume was implicitly expanded into "go to the Titans/Magistrates".

Unless some evidence drastically changes the picture, this seems like a very open and shut case, but I would just add a brief comment into the verdict about the escalation bit.
Title: Re: Accusations of abuse and general harassment
Post by: GoldPanda on December 22, 2012, 02:28:18 AM
I'm here.

Aaron provided a pretty complete record of what happened from his perspective. However, I do have some clarifications to add:

1. Enri has perfectly valid IC reasons for his orders. He has IC knowledge of the fact that Thomas Solari was spying on CE for Carelia, in the form of letters Thomas Solari sent to the rest of the Order of the Raven, with Enri's recent orders attached. He was never 100% sure who the spy in CE was, but he knew for a fact that Thomas Solari was the spy's handler in Carelia. Malus Solari's exploits on Dwilight should also have reached his ears eventually, since House Solari is on his radar now. All of this did not paint a very flattering picture of House Solari to Enri.

So given that, I believe it is perfectly reasonable for him to send a younger (possibly expendable) family member of House Solari away from the front lines. This will prevent most efforts at spying, cut off any opportunities for sabotage, and just as importantly to Enri, prevent the young Remi from gaining any influence or building a power base in CE. Enri knows from experience that the Solaris usually end up causing more damage with their schemes to their own realm than to their enemies. He doesn't have any evidence to use against Remi, but that doesn't mean that he has to make Remi's stay in CE comfortable, fruitful, or beneficial to Remi's career. Considering the difference in rank between Enri and Remi, I also submit that Enri has been reasonably respectful to the young man.

You can call it an IC vendetta from House Kinsey against House Solari if you wish. I personally do not believe it's quite at that level yet. Enri was willing to give young Remi a chance to prove himself, provided that Remi jumped through some hoops to show that he was sincere, but Enri's latest orders sound exasperated, because the young man does not appear to be willing or able to follow basic instructions.

It wasn't even that bad of an assignment. I ask the same question that Enri asked ICly: Is asking a young noble to bodyguard his own liege too much to ask for? Is a mission that is good enough for a Duke too much "grunt work" for a vassal knight?

2. I have publicly, OOCly accused Aaron of spying in-game, yes, but spying is not against the rules, and I hope that people can see my original message to Aaron as the playful jab and welcome that it was meant to be, "dagger eyes" and all. My personal OOC opinions on the act of spying itself was made quite clear, but I was not accusing him of breaking any game rules. So I did not break that clause of the Social Contract: "Do not publicly accuse anyone of cheating, abuses or violations of this contract without proof or evidence." Spying using IC means is none of the above.

I also told him, in private, that I believed he was up to some shenanigans with new players, but this was in private, and I made it clear that I believed it wasn't against the rules either. I would have made a Titan or Magistrate complaint if I felt that Aaron had broken any rules.

3. I'm sorry if Aaron felt that I was harassing him with the few messages I sent to him from ~4 days ago. I made my OOC dislike for him quite clear, and perhaps that was a mistake on my part, but I believe I expressed myself in a calm and professional manner. I also made it clear to him that the discussion was over, at least from my end of it, and that I was not going to keep bothering him about it. And, indeed, I have not bothered him OOCly since then.

I would like to contrast that with his repeated IC and OOC demands for orders (even though Remi's previous orders were quite clear and had not been fulfilled yet), and Aaron OOCly telling me to "grow up", "put on your big boy pants", and publicly asking me "are you that stupid?" To be completely honest, I am a bit upset about all that. If one of my friends said that to me in person, we would not be friends for much longer, if there was no apology forthcoming.

I will be monitoring this thread as best as my schedule allows, and would be happy to answer any questions.
Title: Re: Accusations of abuse and general harassment
Post by: Anaris on December 22, 2012, 02:58:07 AM
In my eyes, at the very least, this line was way out of bounds:

Quote
... I have a theory about spying: You don't really need to gather intel using the old-fashioned ways anymore.

There, you all but outright accused Solari of either multicheating or abusing devly powers to obtain information. (Which, for the record, he can't: he doesn't have access to the live database or current messages sent and received, in any form. Only two people in the game have that access, and those are Tom and me.)
Title: Re: Accusations of abuse and general harassment
Post by: GoldPanda on December 22, 2012, 03:04:53 AM
It seems to me that he is being harassed due to an OOC perception on the part of Yangfan Wang that he is abusing his position as a dev to get an advantage in the game. That's not playing as with friends.

I was careful to never accuse Aaron of abuse or breaking the rules in any way. Unless you want to claim that you can read my mind and accuse me of a thought-crime?  ;)
Title: Re: Accusations of abuse and general harassment
Post by: GoldPanda on December 22, 2012, 03:14:37 AM
In my eyes, at the very least, this line was way out of bounds:

There, you all but outright accused Solari of either multicheating or abusing devly powers to obtain information. (Which, for the record, he can't: he doesn't have access to the live database or current messages sent and received, in any form. Only two people in the game have that access, and those are Tom and me.)

What? No. Here:

Quote
Letter from Enri Kinsey   (6 days, 1 hour ago)
(Personal message to Celestial Fury)
Your Grace,

When House Solari conducts espionage operations, communiques are never passed from one family member to another. That would far too easily stir up suspicion. Instead, House Solari has compromised several families on several islands through a patronage scheme. House Solari has great power and influence on some other islands, and they give promotions in rank to those families whose relatives spy for them on Atamara. Thomas Solari was in the process of building a new power base in Carelia, but he fled after Carelia's defeat. That was the only reason I did not put him on the Villains List.

I am guessing that this Remi is a part of some reverse scheme to regain a Solari beach-head on Atamara. He knows that the chances of us ever trusting him with power is small, so why join CE? So he could sell our secrets in exchange for power.

Please do not place your trust in him.
Sir Enri Kinsey
General of Cagilan Empire
Knight of Ravening

Please don't put words in my mouth. What Enri wrote is my best guess at how Aaron pulls off his spying for House Solari. (Which, again, is not against the rules.) The rest of us actually have to do things like contacting possibly disgruntled enemy knights, making them promises that we might not be able to keep, etc. You know, the hard way. Aaron has some sort of multi-island influence-peddling scheme going on, as far as I can tell. (Which, again, is not against the rules.) I'd admire it if it hasn't been such a thorn on my characters' collective sides.

Quote
"That's why I don't bother with spying, and haven't since leaving Carelia. Despite what you might think, and certainly despite what your character in D'Hara thinks."

He hasn't done any spying since Thomas Solari left Carelia, but apparently he knows what my character in D'Hara thinks, despite not having a character there. That's the only reason I called him a bad liar.
Title: Re: Accusations of abuse and general harassment
Post by: Chenier on December 22, 2012, 03:19:45 AM
Imo, any IC dislike or persecution of this character seems legitimate.

The judgement will be on the OOC content of the discussions.
Title: Re: Accusations of abuse and general harassment
Post by: GoldPanda on December 22, 2012, 03:53:05 AM
In that case, let us put my original "dagger eyes" comment in context:

Quote
Out-of-Character from Remi Solari   (9 days, 4 hours ago)
Message sent to everyone in your realm (66 recipients)
Always said I was going to create a character here some day. Well, now you're stuck with me. My condolences.
Aaron Champion

Out-of-Character from Nicotina Marlboro   (9 days, 2 hours ago)
Message sent to everyone in your realm (66 recipients)
There goes the neighborhood.

Out-of-Character from Mizuhiro Ishida   (8 days, 22 hours ago)
Message sent to everyone in your realm (66 recipients)
So the "illustrious" House Solari has finally come to plague us! XD
En Kai

Out-of-Character from Torsaan ka Habb   (8 days, 22 hours ago)
Message sent to everyone in your realm (66 recipients)
welcome to the dark side, we don't actually have cookies. we do have the tears of the innocent.
Dillan Mendonca

Out-of-Character from Londo Mollari Centaurum   (8 days, 19 hours ago)
Message sent to everyone in your realm (66 recipients)
I don't get it, are you famous, Aaron, or something? and why are you offering condolences? are you trying to be funny?

Out-of-Character from Garro Tarvitz   (8 days, 14 hours ago)
Message sent to everyone in your realm (66 recipients)
Oh dear, now I'm stuck with him on two continents... why did this have to happen to me. :P
Chris Lowe

We were all teasing the new guy. Aaron himself began by offering his "condolences".

Then I expressed to him, in private, my personal OOC dissatisfaction with some of his character's IC actions in Carelia and Solaria. It doesn't always come through in a narrow medium such as text, but I really did try my best to be calm and professional about the whole thing. If that still amounts to "harassment", then I will accept any punishments with contrition. In the future, I do believe I will keep my OOC comments to my mentoring duties, and keep my mouth shut if I had any objective criticism.

However, I would like the Magistrates to consider:

1. The contents and tone of Aaron's own OOC comments to me, both public and in private. I also submit that Devs should be held to a slightly higher standard than us rank-and-file players. We look to you to lead us by example, after all.

2. Aaron did not make his complaint 5 days ago, when we had our OOC discussion, but only after Enri's IC orders. (I just checked. It was 5 days ago, not 4.) It seems to me that the latter, IC move by Enri is what Aaron is truly upset about.
Title: Re: Accusations of abuse and general harassment
Post by: Bedwyr on December 22, 2012, 04:13:07 AM
GoldPanda, while you did not (leaving aside the one comment about "old-fashioned" spying, which is extremely open to interpretation, as I read it the same way Tim did and think others did as well) accuse him of cheating, you did repeatedly, OOCly, publicly, accuse him of not playing fairly.  As DamnTaffer posted, that is accusing him of violating the Social Contract, in a way that is specifically forbidden.  Had you only done it privately, my opinion would be different, as there is only a specific ban on public accusations, but there was a public accusation.

Solari's responses were somewhat insulting, but he was starting in response to an attack on his personal, OOC character, which is one of the few things in this game that will really truly incense me.  And it's not like I have any particular reason to back Solari, I can assure you.
Title: Re: Accusations of abuse and general harassment
Post by: Penchant on December 22, 2012, 05:01:22 AM
Hmmm, yeah, I looked at it to see where/what the accusation was, and it does sound like an accusation, but I would say that Enri/Goldpanda does have evidence.
Quote
I will escalate the matter, and you will lose badly.
Though Solari clarified later, how do you lose badly from getting basically spam? You don't really lose badly its just annoying, but you can lose badly in a magistrate case, so as Solari's clarification was after the fact, I would say that Goldpanda had evidence/proof which does make the accusation allowed.
Quote
Do not publicly accuse anyone of cheating, abuses or violations of this contract without proof or evidence.
Title: Re: Accusations of abuse and general harassment
Post by: GoldPanda on December 22, 2012, 05:08:40 AM
Please, call me Yangfan.

The only message that I could find that fits what you were talking about (in that it deals with unfairness) was this one:

Quote
Out-of-Character from Enri Kinsey   (4 days, 14 hours ago)
Yes, because CE and Carelia & Co. was so "mismatched" at the beginning of the war. Spying is a tool that you always deployed, not something that you reserved for desperate situations.

There is a difference between competitiveness and bad sportsmanship. There is a difference between playing well and taking unfair advantages over others. There is a difference between obeying both the spirit and the letter of the rules, and skirting around the edges and rules-lawyering. Like, oh, say, claiming that you are not realm-merging because there was still that lone stronghold left out in the middle of nowhere, and then throwing its duke under the proverbial bus when he merged with a neighbor. Was it against the rules? Technically, no. Was it a dick move that would have made Machiavelli blush? Yes.

This is supposed to be a friendly game. I find it sad and pathetic the lengths that some players, including Devs, will go to try to "win" unfairly. Sometimes they fall flat on their face anyways. I do get some schadenfreude from that.

"That's why I don't bother with spying, and haven't since leaving Carelia. Despite what you might think, and certainly despite what your character in D'Hara thinks."

... I have a theory about spying: You don't really need to gather intel using the old-fashioned ways anymore.  It makes you out of practice. You are a really bad liar, you know?

I'm not really interested in anything that you have to say at this point.
Yangfan Wang

I would like to note that this message was sent neither "repeatedly" nor "publicly". I was also very careful to never accuse Aaron (or anyone else in particular) of breaking the game rules or the Social Contract. My low opinion of certain unnamed person (or persons?) on the Dev team is out in the open now, but surely that won't come back to bite me in the future. ;)

If that was not what you were referring to, please show me where I repeatedly, OOCly, and publicly accuse him of cheating, or abuse, or breaking any of the game rules, or breaking the Social Contract. I'm not trying to be obtuse here. There is just a lot of messages to go through.

On the other hand, Aaron's response was to insult me, OOCly and repeatedly, and then publicly.
Title: Re: Accusations of abuse and general harassment
Post by: GoldPanda on December 22, 2012, 05:17:04 AM
Hmmm, yeah, I looked at it to see where/what the accusation was, and it does sound like an accusation, but I would say that Enri/Goldpanda does have evidence. Though Solari clarified later, how do you lose badly from getting basically spam? You don't really lose badly its just annoying, but you can lose badly in a magistrate case, so as Solari's clarification was after the fact, I would say that Goldpanda had evidence/proof which does make the accusation allowed.

That is true. I definitely interpreted it as a threat to go to the Titans or Magistrates. I don't see how I can "lose badly" from him spamming me with messages (which is somewhat harassing by itself, but I can always put him on ignore if it got really bad).

And if I may clarify, I never planned to drag Aaron in front of the Magistrates over his threat, as evidenced by the fact that I didn't. I'm not interested in getting him in trouble, despite what I may think of him. And "accusing someone of breaking the rules because they threatened to accuse you of breaking the rules" always seemed like recursive silliness to me. 
Title: Re: Accusations of abuse and general harassment
Post by: Bedwyr on December 22, 2012, 06:25:43 AM
Please, call me Yangfan.

Yangfan it is, then, and I am Matthew.

Quote
I would like to note that this message was sent neither "repeatedly" nor "publicly". I was also very careful to never accuse Aaron (or anyone else in particular) of breaking the game rules or the Social Contract. My low opinion of certain unnamed person (or persons?) on the Dev team is out in the open now, but surely that won't come back to bite me in the future. ;)

My apologies, I misread the initial message dump.  I thought several of those messages were public, and only now on going back do I see that they were private messages.  I had initially thought you were stating them publicly, and he was responding privately, but now I see the "everyone in realm" text on a couple of your public messages, which suggests the others were private.

Which...Is a different situation altogether.

The IC incidents are not an issue except as they relate to OOC problems, so I am going to leave them aside.

Upon re-reading, what I am now seeing is only a public accusation of spying (which there is evidence for), a couple of public arguments that are well within the normal bounds of standard OOC disagreements, and some private messaging that, while nasty, do not violate the prohibition on public accusations.  Does everyone else read it that way (checking now since I so royally screwed up my first reading, heh)?

If that's true, then I return to what I noted in my first post, the threat to escalate the matter, which as Penchant points out and I agree, does not make sense in context of spamming requests, but does in the context of a Magistrates case.
Title: Re: Accusations of abuse and general harassment
Post by: Jim on December 22, 2012, 06:48:48 AM
This wouldn't be the first time someone has accused Mr. Champion of unsportsmanlike conduct and I'm not even talking about the things I have said.
Title: Re: Accusations of abuse and general harassment
Post by: Penchant on December 22, 2012, 07:06:07 AM
This wouldn't be the first time someone has accused Mr. Champion of unsportsmanlike conduct and I'm not even talking about the things I have said.
That helps in no way for the case and seems like you are only slandering his name. Though we are discussing how it seemed that he made it sound like he could have been threatening to do a magistrate case, that is merely to prove Yangfan innocent with his accusation, as Aaron later clarified what he meant.
Title: Re: Accusations of abuse and general harassment
Post by: Jim on December 22, 2012, 07:14:23 AM
That helps in no way for the case and seems like you are only slandering his name. Though we are discussing how it seemed that he made it sound like he could have been threatening to do a magistrate case, that is merely to prove Yangfan innocent with his accusation, as Aaron later clarified what he meant.

Sir, I believe Yangfan had some very valid points.
Title: Re: Accusations of abuse and general harassment
Post by: Vellos on December 22, 2012, 07:23:16 AM
IMO, we shouldn't totally disregard the IC things. We do have to ask why the IC assignments were given.

IC reasons do exist: as both Yangfan has said, and as I postulated.

BUT, the messages perplex me about whether the IC things were actually motivated ICly.

Example: If I OOC message someone and say, "I'm banning your character because of XYZ you said on the forum," but then the character also happens to be breaking some realm law, the ban is STILL a violation of the SC: because the existence of IC reasons is not sufficient.

IMHO, and I know I'm in a minority on this, players with negative OOC history have to walk on tip-toes around each other and go out of their way to play nice. As best I can tell, Aaron was doing this: making a new character playing in a new realm in a new crowd. Yangfan decided to haze the new guy to get him to go away, because he didn't OOCly trust him based on an OOC belief about spy networks that he regards as "fuzzy" in regards to their IC/OOCness. To me, that's wrong. And here's why:

If the alleged spy network was "bad," then a Magistrates case could have been filed. If its "unsportsmanslike" or not playing with friends, Magistrates can address it. Seriously– I'd love to have somebody bring up a case about a multi-continental secretive spy/patronage ring. It'd give me an AWESOME chance to soapbox about clanning again. But such a case did not appear. Such a case having not appeared, the existence of the spying activity, and especially its negative moral character, must be ignored for a ruling. Because, IMHO, if such a multi-continental secretive network did exist, it would be next to impossible for it to be acceptable within the Social Contract. Accusing someone of such a network IS accusing them of cheating, and then predicating your treatment of their characters on your (unproven) beliefs about their (possible) behavior that (may be) cheating is inappropriate.

Ultimately, it seems a mild violation to me. I don't see either party here as having done anything particularly egregious; just some ruffled feathers– but, to me, again, it still appears that Yangfan is the one who acted inappropriately first (I won't address the "escalation" thing here), in that it does not appear to me most likely that his choice of orders for Remi was really about IC family vendettas. It seems like it was about a semi-OOC alleged spy ring. And yes, the lines between IC and OOC get fuzzy here: but it's woefully insufficient to say, "I can think of an IC reason I might have done it!"

Even the IC message to Celestial Fury is a thinly veiled discussion of game mechanics, IMHO.

Title: Re: Accusations of abuse and general harassment
Post by: Velax on December 22, 2012, 08:21:44 AM
If a family is well known - IC or OOC - for spying, it seems perfectly reasonable - and perfectly sensible - to not put a new member of that family into a position where they can more easily spy on your realm until they have earned some trust. If a Leonidas appeared in my realm, for example, he would not be assigned a position from which he could gain knowledge of army orders because that family are well known spies and traitors. Assuming that character was allowed to remain in my realm at all.
Title: Re: Accusations of abuse and general harassment
Post by: GoldPanda on December 22, 2012, 09:17:52 AM
Thank you for taking the time to re-read, Matthew. I respectfully disagree that I was being nasty. If someone OOCly lied to my face, I believe I should be able to call them a liar. If the lie was not believable, I believe I should be able to call them a bad liar. Friends should not be lying to friends, and certainly not insulting my intelligence with obvious lies.

Lyman/Vellos, I apologize if I am misinterpreting you, but are you saying that you believe what Aaron did was against the rules, and because I failed to report it, therefore it is inadmissible? I apologize if that's not what you meant, but that seems to me to be a rather arbitrary way to remove parts of a case from consideration.

My OOC grumbles actually came after Enri's IC hatred. He learned about Thomas Solari's spying via IC means before I had any OOC knowledge of it happening. I suppose some of Enri's feelings could have rubbed off on me, but it definitely wasn't the other way around. Even if I did not object to it OOCly, Enri still would have done the exact same thing. It wasn't me thinking up an IC excuse after the fact.

Enri is isolating Remi because there is zero trust there. I told Aaron that I disapproved of his actions, hoping that he would stop it if enough people expressed their disapproval to him. Those are two separate channels. I should not have to censor myself just because they happen to point in the same direction.

And I have no idea what clanning has to do with this.
Title: Re: Accusations of abuse and general harassment
Post by: Gustav Kuriga on December 22, 2012, 09:24:02 AM
Honestly, I don't like accusations of cheating/spying OOC, private or not. Either way, you aren't playing as you would with friends. I personally would have deleted my character right then and started somewhere that you weren't. I don't care if there has been IC spying (as long as it was done using only IC means), that is no reason to OOC'ly send messages of this nature to someone.
Title: Re: Accusations of abuse and general harassment
Post by: GoldPanda on December 22, 2012, 09:48:43 AM
Honestly, I don't like accusations of cheating/spying OOC, private or not. Either way, you aren't playing as you would with friends. I personally would have deleted my character right then and started somewhere that you weren't. I don't care if there has been IC spying (as long as it was done using only IC means), that is no reason to OOC'ly send messages of this nature to someone.

Aaron initiated contact with me by first joining CE, and then OOC messaging me. I expressed to him my disapproval of his actions as politely as I could mange. Had I tracked him down, joined one of his realms, and then started sending him nastygrams, then I would agree with you.
Title: Re: Accusations of abuse and general harassment
Post by: Fury on December 22, 2012, 09:50:45 AM
Did it have to come to this?  :(

There were no public accusations of anything.
There were private statements of something.
Title: Re: Accusations of abuse and general harassment
Post by: Gustav Kuriga on December 22, 2012, 11:04:36 AM
I don't care if it's public or private. That honestly doesn't mean much to me as to whether it's right or wrong. I could privately say someone is a stupid ass nigger, and just because it's private doesn't mean it isn't harassment.
Title: Re: Accusations of abuse and general harassment
Post by: GoldPanda on December 22, 2012, 01:09:27 PM
... Anyway, I would like to request an explanation from Aaron, on how he planned on making me "lose badly" by "escalating" his repeated messages. So far his clarification is not making much sense to me.
Title: Re: Accusations of abuse and general harassment
Post by: GoldPanda on December 22, 2012, 01:44:38 PM
I will be traveling tomorrow, but I'll be back in two days to answer any further questions.
Title: Re: Accusations of abuse and general harassment
Post by: Chenier on December 22, 2012, 02:58:07 PM
IMO, we shouldn't totally disregard the IC things. We do have to ask why the IC assignments were given.

IC reasons do exist: as both Yangfan has said, and as I postulated.

BUT, the messages perplex me about whether the IC things were actually motivated ICly.

Example: If I OOC message someone and say, "I'm banning your character because of XYZ you said on the forum," but then the character also happens to be breaking some realm law, the ban is STILL a violation of the SC: because the existence of IC reasons is not sufficient.

IMHO, and I know I'm in a minority on this, players with negative OOC history have to walk on tip-toes around each other and go out of their way to play nice. As best I can tell, Aaron was doing this: making a new character playing in a new realm in a new crowd. Yangfan decided to haze the new guy to get him to go away, because he didn't OOCly trust him based on an OOC belief about spy networks that he regards as "fuzzy" in regards to their IC/OOCness. To me, that's wrong. And here's why:

If the alleged spy network was "bad," then a Magistrates case could have been filed. If its "unsportsmanslike" or not playing with friends, Magistrates can address it. Seriously– I'd love to have somebody bring up a case about a multi-continental secretive spy/patronage ring. It'd give me an AWESOME chance to soapbox about clanning again. But such a case did not appear. Such a case having not appeared, the existence of the spying activity, and especially its negative moral character, must be ignored for a ruling. Because, IMHO, if such a multi-continental secretive network did exist, it would be next to impossible for it to be acceptable within the Social Contract. Accusing someone of such a network IS accusing them of cheating, and then predicating your treatment of their characters on your (unproven) beliefs about their (possible) behavior that (may be) cheating is inappropriate.

Ultimately, it seems a mild violation to me. I don't see either party here as having done anything particularly egregious; just some ruffled feathers– but, to me, again, it still appears that Yangfan is the one who acted inappropriately first (I won't address the "escalation" thing here), in that it does not appear to me most likely that his choice of orders for Remi was really about IC family vendettas. It seems like it was about a semi-OOC alleged spy ring. And yes, the lines between IC and OOC get fuzzy here: but it's woefully insufficient to say, "I can think of an IC reason I might have done it!"

Even the IC message to Celestial Fury is a thinly veiled discussion of game mechanics, IMHO.

I disagree. OOC doesn't excuse IC. If my character plans a rebellion, and people catch on to it. I can't save myself by sending OOC slurs to everyone, and then whining i'm being  banned for OOC reasons on top of the IC ones. If there are legitimate IC reasons to persecute someone, the existence of OOC reaons doesn't make the IC reaons any less legitimate. It just adds a potential additional burden of proof, no more.

Spying is something that we must assume as done IC, until proven otherwise. It also has direct IC consequences. And is viewed by the majority as being dishonorable. Characters would therefore have plenty of IC reasons to dislike characters or families suspected of doing it a lot.

Playing in any given realm is not an IR. If you go to a realm where your family is disliked, you must accept the risk that you'll be banned on sight or otherwise marginalized or mistreated.
Title: Re: Accusations of abuse and general harassment
Post by: Fury on December 22, 2012, 03:34:25 PM
I don't care if it's public or private. That honestly doesn't mean much to me as to whether it's right or wrong. I could privately say someone is a stupid ass nigger, and just because it's private doesn't mean it isn't harassment.

In the same way that using an opportunity to mouth off to someone and just because it's thinly veiled as an example doesn't mean it isn't harassment?

The facts are what I stated: no public accusations - if there is, point it out. If there's harassment in the private statements go ahead and quote the relevant sentences in its context.
Title: Re: Accusations of abuse and general harassment
Post by: Anaris on December 22, 2012, 04:02:14 PM
One point that's puzzled me in all this:

If Aaron is supposedly this grand spymaster, controlling a web of spies across multiple continents and bringing in information from all corners without any trace...

...why the hell would he create a character himself in a realm to spy in it? Openly, announcing himself to the realm? And if he's spying, who's he reporting to?

Furthermore, just by being in the realm and army, he can see quite a lot of info that could be highly militarily useful. If you really thought he was spying on you right now, why not just get him banned?
Title: Re: Accusations of abuse and general harassment
Post by: Fury on December 22, 2012, 04:44:13 PM
There's no way to stop spying and it's not against the rules as long as no cheating is involved which isn't the case here and there aren't accusations of it either. Usually characters in suspect in one form of another are given limited roles until their loyalty can be assessed. The part of the Social Contract that would relate to this is:
Quote
Always give newcomers the benefit of the doubt.

Does this mean that they can be integrated into the realm right away without a cooling off period? Would it infringe on the rules if their roles were limited?

The more related part of the Social Contract is:
Quote
Do not insult or harrass other players

It started of friendly enough, player of Remi sending an OOC msg to player of Enri as an OOC nod from one veteran to another that apparently wasn't reciprocated. I sense that the reason may be related to this:
Quote
There is a difference between obeying both the spirit and the letter of the rules, and skirting around the edges and rules-lawyering. Like, oh, say, claiming that you are not realm-merging because there was still that lone stronghold left out in the middle of nowhere, and then throwing its duke under the proverbial bus when he merged with a neighbor.
Was there a previous incident involving both characters here or just a general dislike of the way something was presumably done?

What next occured was that both didn't like how things were progressing OOC so both raised a notch until... well, here we are.

Title: Re: Accusations of abuse and general harassment
Post by: Vellos on December 22, 2012, 05:04:58 PM
Lyman/Vellos, I apologize if I am misinterpreting you, but are you saying that you believe what Aaron did was against the rules, and because I failed to report it, therefore it is inadmissible? I apologize if that's not what you meant, but that seems to me to be a rather arbitrary way to remove parts of a case from consideration.

I mean you've never given any evidence of the behavior. And if it were true, IMHO, that would be a magistrate case in itself. But lacking any evidence, you can't come into an OOC place and expect your assertion to hold any weight. The discussion of semi-OOC spying (and using cross-continental family ties definitely fits that bill given the presumption of world separation), in an OOC forum, is equivalent to you saying, "I have an OOC vendetta" over and over again unless and until you can provide evidence. Predicating IC actions on a form of spying you believe to be "unsportsmanlike," that is, not playing with friends, that is, a violation of the SC, that is, an OOCly negative act... is not okay.

IC is not your place to seek justice for OOC slights. It just isn't. And if you do, it's unfair play.

My OOC grumbles actually came after Enri's IC hatred. He learned about Thomas Solari's spying via IC means before I had any OOC knowledge of it happening. I suppose some of Enri's feelings could have rubbed off on me, but it definitely wasn't the other way around. Even if I did not object to it OOCly, Enri still would have done the exact same thing. It wasn't me thinking up an IC excuse after the fact.

Based on your comments here and in those messages, it appears pretty evident to me that Enri's feelings have rubbed off on you: and did so prior to Remi's arrival.

Enri is isolating Remi because there is zero trust there. I told Aaron that I disapproved of his actions, hoping that he would stop it if enough people expressed their disapproval to him. Those are two separate channels. I should not have to censor myself just because they happen to point in the same direction.

Yes, you should censor yourself. You cannot isolate a character because of your disapproval of a player. To me, it seems like that this is exactly what you have done– though I'll admit the case is very complex, and I'm hardly dead-set in that belief.

There's no way to stop spying and it's not against the rules as long as no cheating is involved which isn't the case here and there aren't accusations of it either. Usually characters in suspect in one form of another are given limited roles until their loyalty can be assessed. The part of the Social Contract that would relate to this is:
Does this mean that they can be integrated into the realm right away without a cooling off period? Would it infringe on the rules if their roles were limited?

The more related part of the Social Contract is:
It started of friendly enough, player of Remi sending an OOC msg to player of Enri as an OOC nod from one veteran to another that apparently wasn't reciprocated. I sense that the reason may be related to this:Was there a previous incident involving both characters here or just a general dislike of the way something was presumably done?

What next occured was that both didn't like how things were progressing OOC so both raised a notch until... well, here we are.



I.... agree with Fury. Holy crap.

Emphasis on the "There's no way to stop spying" part.

There isn't. Get over it. Spying is one of the few ways that lower-ranking nobles can get influence with very high-ranking nobles. It is a valuable in-game social leveler allowing less powerful players to gain a footing with more powerful players.

I disagree. OOC doesn't excuse IC. If my character plans a rebellion, and people catch on to it. I can't save myself by sending OOC slurs to everyone, and then whining i'm being  banned for OOC reasons on top of the IC ones. If there are legitimate IC reasons to persecute someone, the existence of OOC reaons doesn't make the IC reaons any less legitimate. It just adds a potential additional burden of proof, no more.

Spying is something that we must assume as done IC, until proven otherwise. It also has direct IC consequences. And is viewed by the majority as being dishonorable. Characters would therefore have plenty of IC reasons to dislike characters or families suspected of doing it a lot.

Playing in any given realm is not an IR. If you go to a realm where your family is disliked, you must accept the risk that you'll be banned on sight or otherwise marginalized or mistreated.

Question is one of chronology. If you have an OOC vendetta, it pre-exists, then you add in IC motivation– bad. If something is IC, THEN something OOC occurs, certainly you can continue to act on the IC actions.

My argument is that Yangfan's opinions about Aaron certainly pre-exist Remi's arrival in CE. That he has almost explicitly said in those messages that the orders for Remi are OOC motivated. He has never offered any evidence of the secretive, cross-continental spy and patronage network that he alleges.

Also, from the SC:

"Note that during roleplays, characters can be played as aggressive, as long as it is clear and obvious that the opposite character is the target, not the player behind him."

The right of characters to be aggressive is conditioned on the obviousness of the player's goodwill. To me, Yangfan's goodwill was not obvious. Thus, aggressive acts seem inappropriate. It is not clear that the character is the target. Again, in a case where you reasonably think your actions might be negatively received or believed to have OOC motivations, you must be exceptionally careful to demonstrate goodwill.

---

Also, I was 99% sure somewhere in the government rules there was a prohibition on banning someone because of their family, but I can't find it now. I wanted to look at the wording in order to respond to this thread, and also Velax' comment. But now I can't find the page for which I was searching. Anybody know what I'm talking about?

Title: Re: Accusations of abuse and general harassment
Post by: Bedwyr on December 22, 2012, 05:45:26 PM
I mean you've never given any evidence of the behavior. And if it were true, IMHO, that would be a magistrate case in itself. But lacking any evidence, you can't come into an OOC place and expect your assertion to hold any weight. The discussion of semi-OOC spying (and using cross-continental family ties definitely fits that bill given the presumption of world separation), in an OOC forum, is equivalent to you saying, "I have an OOC vendetta" over and over again unless and until you can provide evidence. Predicating IC actions on a form of spying you believe to be "unsportsmanlike," that is, not playing with friends, that is, a violation of the SC, that is, an OOCly negative act... is not okay.

The multi-continental family ties group is a known fact, if it's what I think it is.  And I kinda started it, mostly by sending out an all-call with the characters who were on good terms with Koli when he was preparing for a colony on Dwilight.  A number of people from Arcaea and a couple of other places arrived, and formed a good chunk of the core group of the colony (though by no means all of them).  When new people joined the group, one of the questions they often asked was "Hey, any other good realms?" and given the noble shortage across the game pretty much everyone would fall over themselves suggesting other realms they were in that needed people.  From things I've picked up, I think Solari picked up a lot of the pieces of this group after I had to bow out.  The "patronage" part is where it gets interesting, as (at least when I was around) it was a lot more "thank the gods we have someone actually interested in RPing and doing more than the usual things, get him whatever position he wants!" than "your cousin did me a good turn so here's a lordship".  I don't think any Ruler or Duke these days has any trouble understanding the ways the severe noble shortage have influenced the position-granting process.

But it was never done (again, when I was around, but I have no particular reason to believe otherwise) OOC.  The whole thing was done in character, with quite a lot of talk about it, some of the families formally associated (one of my plans that sadly had to get put on hold was an official Affiliated Families registry), and would have been fairly easy to see. if you knew what you were looking for, though I can quite understand that at any distance it would look a little weird.  The idea that a fair bit of spying would get done in it isn't hard to imagine.  But, the idea of it being clanning is rather silly, for precisely the reasons Yangfang pointed out (the recruiting newcomers issue).  Tried to get as many people into it as we could, because one of the things I found was that if someone had a couple of good realms, they tended to stick around a lot more.

Sorry for the long response, but this issue seems pretty crucial to the case.

Quote
Yes, you should censor yourself. You cannot isolate a character because of your disapproval of a player. To me, it seems like that this is exactly what you have done– though I'll admit the case is very complex, and I'm hardly dead-set in that belief.

But that's the kind of thing done to suspected spies on a regular basis.  Send them off monster hunting for a while away from the front and see what happens.  Especially if you have a decent counter-spy network set up and have them look for information that could be gotten just from being in an army without anything else.

Quote
Question is one of chronology. If you have an OOC vendetta, it pre-exists, then you add in IC motivation– bad. If something is IC, THEN something OOC occurs, certainly you can continue to act on the IC actions.

So we're now in the business of deciding whether the chicken or the egg came first and making decisions on it?  I would far, far, far rather go with something that isn't nearly that murky.

Quote
Also, from the SC:

"Note that during roleplays, characters can be played as aggressive, as long as it is clear and obvious that the opposite character is the target, not the player behind him."

The right of characters to be aggressive is conditioned on the obviousness of the player's goodwill. To me, Yangfan's goodwill was not obvious. Thus, aggressive acts seem inappropriate. It is not clear that the character is the target. Again, in a case where you reasonably think your actions might be negatively received or believed to have OOC motivations, you must be exceptionally careful to demonstrate goodwill.

But his character wasn't being aggressive.  Sending a new noble off monster hunting isn't aggressive, and it's not out of the ordinary.  He got a bit testy when said new noble questioned the orders (admittedly with some reason given the issues on where the liege precisely was), but this is the primary General of the largest realm in the largest war the continent has seen since the fall of Abington.  I can't even imagine how Damian would have reacted to a new noble pestering him for orders every day after he'd said "go monster hunting for a while".  I was so crazy-stressed while General of Abington that I later made a (mostly kept) promise to never, ever be General again, and Damian was a wreck.

Quote
Also, I was 99% sure somewhere in the government rules there was a prohibition on banning someone because of their family, but I can't find it now. I wanted to look at the wording in order to respond to this thread, and also Velax' comment. But now I can't find the page for which I was searching. Anybody know what I'm talking about?

Yes, you can't ban someone just for their family.  Sending them off monster-hunting when they first show up because of their family is standard practice, especially if you don't have time to figure it out just at the moment.
Title: Re: Accusations of abuse and general harassment
Post by: Solari on December 22, 2012, 05:55:18 PM
I'm on the road, so pardon the brevity of my reply. In response to Yangfan's request, I'll clarify the comment on escalation. From my perspective, Yangfan was grinding a personal axe and privately making an ass of himself. I felt like my character was being put in a poorly constructed IC purgatory as a result. So, I endeavored to return the favor and make Enri's life as miserable as possible through protocol. Constantly requesting orders would just be the beginning. Next, I'd have started asking the marshals for orders and bringing in the rest of the chain of command. Then I'd change classes and wander to the front, just to cause some grief over my super secret spy plans. Stupid and childish? You bet. But warranted, IMHO, for someone who's awfully fond of accusing me of unsporting play—based entirely on an incorrect assumption of who I am or how I play—while dishing it out himself.

But I'd hardly enjoy it, and it would work against my own interets. I'd rather that this whole public spat result in a reboot, where I have a chance to play in a realm and with another player that I've rather liked from afar for awhile.
Title: Re: Accusations of abuse and general harassment
Post by: Chenier on December 22, 2012, 07:49:48 PM

I would interpret "newcommers" as being "new accounts", not "new characters in the realm", or at most as "new characters in the realm without any history of interest to those in the realm". In other words, you don't persecute someone just because he's new. Just because you don't know him well enough.

I would not, however, extend this to new nobles in the realm who come from established families and who have made their share of enemies over the years, if it is a result of their family's heritage.

Which isn't the case, here. He's not mistrusted because he is new. He is mistrusted because of his family's history.
Title: Re: Accusations of abuse and general harassment
Post by: Chenier on December 22, 2012, 07:56:36 PM
Also, I was 99% sure somewhere in the government rules there was a prohibition on banning someone because of their family, but I can't find it now. I wanted to look at the wording in order to respond to this thread, and also Velax' comment. But now I can't find the page for which I was searching. Anybody know what I'm talking about?

It's against a policy (hidden somewhere out of plain sight, I believe) to ban someone just because he also has a character in another realm. This may be what you are thinking about.

The othe restriction, off the top of my head, are: just because he came from an enemy realm, or just because you felt like banning someone randomly.

If he played a key role in that enemy realm, however, or if his family has a long history of doing rather nasty things, it's legitimate in my book.
Title: Re: Accusations of abuse and general harassment
Post by: Telrunya on December 22, 2012, 09:12:18 PM
Quote
Enemy Realm Banning

    Sun Oct 16 19:58:21 CEST 2005

Because this has come up and is going to come up again:

My official policy on characters in enemy realms, and especially on banning them is this:

Having a character in some other, even enemy, realm alone should not ever be enough cause for a ban.

Spying, of course, can be grounds for either an IC (if it's roleplayed) or even an OOC (if it is done OOC) ban.

There are some people who enjoy fighting themselves, and can perfectly well seperate their characters. There are many people who might not realize that there is something wrong with this. And, of course, there are the cases of shifting diplomacy, where the friend of yesterday is the enemy of tomorrow.

Give people a chance. Any policy of "immediate ban" is absolutely not within the spirit of the game. It is paranoia, and a kind of paranoia that can easily turn perfectly innocent and good players away from the game, so I don't want it.

If you have reasons to suspect that someone is channeling information to your enemy, by all means use the tools available (ban, fine, message groups, whatever).

Just having a character somewhere else _is fine_. The islands where this is undesired by the game already have a one-character limit, so it can't happen. If the game allows you to put two characters on the island, then the game also allows you to put them in enemy realms.

Source: http://wiki.battlemaster.org/wiki/FAQ/Tom%27s_Position_on_Banning

Is that the one you're looking for? Here's also the Ban page: http://wiki.battlemaster.org/wiki/Help:Bans , which mentions not banning someone just because they joined from an enemy Realm.
Title: Re: Accusations of abuse and general harassment
Post by: Vellos on December 22, 2012, 11:53:53 PM
Yeah, that's it.

My point was that BM has a presumption that you shouldn't penalize people for their family. No, that's not even remotely SMA. Neither is giving female characters equality. We do it because it's essential for the game to be fun.

IMHO, yes, we should force players to trust players who have played other characters that their characters distrust.
Title: Re: Accusations of abuse and general harassment
Post by: Penchant on December 23, 2012, 12:10:04 AM
Yeah, that's it.

My point was that BM has a presumption that you shouldn't penalize people for their family. No, that's not even remotely SMA. Neither is giving female characters equality. We do it because it's essential for the game to be fun.

IMHO, yes, we should force players to trust players who have played other characters that their characters distrust.
But that's not what Tom's Position on it is. No immediate bans, but Enri had characters that the new Solari came to spy so he used his tools to start tests.
Title: Re: Accusations of abuse and general harassment
Post by: Marlboro on December 23, 2012, 12:17:02 AM
I'd rather that this whole public spat result in a reboot, where I have a chance to play in a realm and with another player that I've rather liked from afar for awhile.

Can this be in the ruling? Aaron and Yangfan are probably my two favorite players and seeing a Solari show up in CE was like Christmas. Finding out that they didn't get along at all was like the opposite of Christmas.

Mandate them to be friends. I need this, guys.
Title: Re: Accusations of abuse and general harassment
Post by: Chenier on December 23, 2012, 01:29:19 AM
Yeah, that's it.

My point was that BM has a presumption that you shouldn't penalize people for their family. No, that's not even remotely SMA. Neither is giving female characters equality. We do it because it's essential for the game to be fun.

IMHO, yes, we should force players to trust players who have played other characters that their characters distrust.

As Penchant said, that's not what the rules actually said. I have seen people punished for family ties, I have had characters punished for family ties, and I have punished characters for family ties. Indeed, I'm pretty sure that Tom confirmed on these forums that it was justified to act this way with such notable families as the Solari, the Chénier, etc. You aren't punishing the other just because he had a no-name noble in some enemy realm. You are punishing for what the family has a great reputation of doing. Perhaps even against one of your own family members.

And afaik, women had a lot more rights in the middle ages than in the renaissance. Blood was what mattered. There were many queens and duchesses.
Title: Re: Accusations of abuse and general harassment
Post by: Vellos on December 23, 2012, 04:34:49 AM
As Penchant said, that's not what the rules actually said. I have seen people punished for family ties, I have had characters punished for family ties, and I have punished characters for family ties. Indeed, I'm pretty sure that Tom confirmed on these forums that it was justified to act this way with such notable families as the Solari, the Chénier, etc. You aren't punishing the other just because he had a no-name noble in some enemy realm. You are punishing for what the family has a great reputation of doing. Perhaps even against one of your own family members.

And afaik, women had a lot more rights in the middle ages than in the renaissance. Blood was what mattered. There were many queens and duchesses.


....

I was next to 100% sure Tom actually said the opposite.

And even if he has said that– it doesn't make sense. I'd really like to hear him explain that position. The idea that players are going to be able to separate between "family ties" and "player habits" seems untenable to me.
Title: Re: Accusations of abuse and general harassment
Post by: Bedwyr on December 23, 2012, 05:58:12 AM

....

I was next to 100% sure Tom actually said the opposite.

And even if he has said that– it doesn't make sense. I'd really like to hear him explain that position. The idea that players are going to be able to separate between "family ties" and "player habits" seems untenable to me.

What I remember Tom saying is the only time insta-bans were permissible is if the same family had several (not one, two, or even three) characters join and commit treason or something similar to the point where it was actually griefing.  That said, treating someone with suspicion, including giving them less sensitive military assignments, seems quite reasonable.
Title: Re: Accusations of abuse and general harassment
Post by: egamma on December 23, 2012, 06:21:12 AM
I have been playing with Yangfan in D'Hara for 881 days, and I must say, I've never seen him treat someone unfairly. I will also say the same thing about Aaron, although I haven't played nearly as long, just a few months, and his character was inactive and is now paused in Oritolon.

It's a real shame that these players couldn't have put forth an effort to mend fences between them, on their own.
Title: Re: Accusations of abuse and general harassment
Post by: Vellos on December 23, 2012, 06:54:04 AM
What I remember Tom saying is the only time insta-bans were permissible is if the same family had several (not one, two, or even three) characters join and commit treason or something similar to the point where it was actually griefing.  That said, treating someone with suspicion, including giving them less sensitive military assignments, seems quite reasonable.

No, I don't think it's quite reasonable to decide that a new character deserves indefinite drudgery duty, despite his liege's contrary assignment, because you regard the player as engaged in semi-OOC spying. That's not reasonable.

If you have a reason to believe that that specific character was spying, sure. But it's not permissible to just look at the last name (or User ID, same thing) and decide that someone deserves different (especially negative) IC treatment: even though that is a very medieval thing to do.

I'll reiterate I don't think that there has been an egregious offense here deserving of any particularly stiff penalty– I concur with what many others have said, that the players in question really should have been able to sort this out on their own. But I do not think the Magistrates should set a precedent that even hints at permitting people to enforce OOC friendships/hostilities via IC behavior– and Yangfan has not been in any sense ambiguous about the fact that he does regard Aaron as playing unfairly, and that does influence his actions.

If players are behaving unfairly, an OOC ban or a Magistrates case is appropriate: not an attempt at IC vindictiveness.
Title: Re: Accusations of abuse and general harassment
Post by: GoldPanda on December 23, 2012, 07:39:16 AM
One point that's puzzled me in all this:

If Aaron is supposedly this grand spymaster, controlling a web of spies across multiple continents and bringing in information from all corners without any trace...

...why the hell would he create a character himself in a realm to spy in it? Openly, announcing himself to the realm? And if he's spying, who's he reporting to?

Furthermore, just by being in the realm and army, he can see quite a lot of info that could be highly militarily useful. If you really thought he was spying on you right now, why not just get him banned?

I believe I explained this in an earlier message (but it was semi-hidden in a quoted post). Enri and his realm-mates rooted out Thomas Solari's power base in Carelia and basically chased him out of Atamara. Enri's reasoning is that House Solari does not care about a realm unless they are in power in that realm. So there is no benefit working for any realm until they get empowered somewhere. The fastest way to do that would be to join a realm that they have a grudge against, and then sell military secrets to one of its enemies, in exchange for "future considerations" from that enemy. In other words, Enri was saying that, Remi is probably a spy because the Solaris no longer have a power base on Atamara. They will want to rebuild one so that they can get back to being spymasters instead of grunts. And since they probably have no interest in helping CE, then they must be against CE.

Banning Remi outright would be against the rules OOCly, and against Enri's own particular sense of honor ICly.

Title: Re: Accusations of abuse and general harassment
Post by: GoldPanda on December 23, 2012, 07:46:18 AM
In response to Lyman's comments, I would like to clarify something:

I have never, ICly or OOCly, even implied that there was any OOC component to the Solari's spy ring. As far as I could tell, everything was done ICly and no game rules were broken. That is why I did not report it. I felt that there was nothing to report.

However, why does it have to be black or white? It doesn't have to fall into either "completely against the rules" and "not against the rules are therefore completely okay". Why can't I say "this is not against the rules, but I believe its net contribution to the game is negative, and that you should stop it"?
Title: Re: Accusations of abuse and general harassment
Post by: GoldPanda on December 23, 2012, 07:55:14 AM
(Sorry about all these messages. I am replying as I catch up. I can consolidate my posts if people feel that it's annoying.)

Quote
My argument is that Yangfan's opinions about Aaron certainly pre-exist Remi's arrival in CE. That he has almost explicitly said in those messages that the orders for Remi are OOC motivated.

In response to Lyman's claim that my OOC opinions about Aaron predate Remi's arrival in CE, of course that is true. What can I do about it? The incidents that soured my opinion of Aaron occurred long before Remi was created as a character. I'm not a time traveler. :p

The fact of the matter is, Enri learned of Thomas's nasty spy ring ICly before I knew anything about it OOCly. It took me completely by surprise. However, Enri's hatred for the Solari family definitely predates my OOC dissatisfaction with Aaron. Spying on him was enough reason for Enri to hate the Solaris. It took me several more incidents over the course of years to develop my mild objections to Aaron. I say mild and note that I never tracked Aaron down and initiated contact with him. He came to my realm and initiated contact with me. Only then did I express my honest opinions in the hopes that he would be moved and change his behavior. Perhaps my mistake was responding to the OOC message at all.
Title: Re: Accusations of abuse and general harassment
Post by: GoldPanda on December 23, 2012, 08:02:06 AM
I'm on the road, so pardon the brevity of my reply. In response to Yangfan's request, I'll clarify the comment on escalation. From my perspective, Yangfan was grinding a personal axe and privately making an ass of himself. I felt like my character was being put in a poorly constructed IC purgatory as a result. So, I endeavored to return the favor and make Enri's life as miserable as possible through protocol. Constantly requesting orders would just be the beginning. Next, I'd have started asking the marshals for orders and bringing in the rest of the chain of command. Then I'd change classes and wander to the front, just to cause some grief over my super secret spy plans. Stupid and childish? You bet. But warranted, IMHO, for someone who's awfully fond of accusing me of unsporting play—based entirely on an incorrect assumption of who I am or how I play—while dishing it out himself.

But I'd hardly enjoy it, and it would work against my own interets. I'd rather that this whole public spat result in a reboot, where I have a chance to play in a realm and with another player that I've rather liked from afar for awhile.

Aaron, I still don't see how this is going to make me "lose badly". In fact your escalation plan seems like a Christmas gift for Enri. Harassing the rest of the command chain would have just angered more powerful nobles, who would be mad at Remi, not Enri. And as soon as Remi was north of Eaglin, he would have been banned for flagrant disregard of orders.

And so far, Remi has done none of those things.

So what was I supposed to think? Was your threat to "escalate the matter" and make me "lose badly" a threat to deploy this convoluted scheme, or go straight to the magistrates? If you consider both threats as possible interpretations, which one have you actually carried out?
Title: Re: Accusations of abuse and general harassment
Post by: Bedwyr on December 23, 2012, 08:27:13 AM
No, I don't think it's quite reasonable to decide that a new character deserves indefinite drudgery duty, despite his liege's contrary assignment, because you regard the player as engaged in semi-OOC spying. That's not reasonable.

No one said anything about infinite drudgery duty.  In the first place, monster hunting is a necessary task even in big wars.  In the second, putting someone on monster hunting detail until they prove themselves is a hell of a lot different than "infinite drudgery duty".  The liege's assignment is completely beside the point.  That could have sparked an interesting power struggle, but has no relation to anything OOC.
Title: Re: Accusations of abuse and general harassment
Post by: GoldPanda on December 23, 2012, 08:41:00 AM
And finally, here was my thought process during the whole incident:

Aaron and I knew each other by reputation by now. So when he approached me with an OOC message after joining CE, I thought that I could engage him in meaningful dialog regarding his past behavior, some of which I felt was not rule-breaking but detrimental to the game. (I'm willing to elaborate on this if necessary, but Aaron is not the one on trial here.) I suppose I got a little "testy" after Aaron refused to concede any ground rhetorically. I felt the conversation going in a non-constructive direction, so I cut it off. I chalked it up to "oh well, I tried" and considered the matter closed.

This was a completely separate matter from what Enri was considering doing to Remi. You are free to not believe me, but I've been playing this old bastard long enough that he has a mind of his own now. I'm not saying that there is zero-overlap between Enri and Yangfan as individuals, but there are some things where there can be no cross-influence and no compromise. This is one of them. Enri was going to get some amount of payback out of this Solari whelp. He could feel it in his bones. I personally thought it was childish and felt bad for Remi.

Even if Remi came to CE bearing enough gifts and intel to make Enri forget past grievances, I still would have talked to Aaron about my dissatisfaction with him. On the other hand, even if Aaron convinced me that I was in the wrong, Enri would still have sent Remi away from the front lines. Those are two completely separate, different, distinct channels. I should not be punished because they happen to coincide. If you punish me, then you better punish every other player who ever ICly attacked a noble whose player he disliked, or ever ICly helped a realm because he liked the players there. I agree that it looks bad on the surface. I challenge anyone to say that this does not happen on a daily basis.

I figured that I've been playing BM long enough that I could be given the benefit of doubt on this, both by Aaron and by the Magistrates. Apparently I am mistaken.

Aaron, if you had filed a Magistrate complaint soon after our OOC conversation, I would have conceded that I was being unfriendly and apologized to you. I would have thought that you were being overly sensitive, but the apology would have been sincere.

If you had came to me with politeness instead of insults after Remi received Enri's orders, I would have been happy to explain Enri's IC reasoning, AND what hoops Remi has to jump through to obtain his trust. You probably would have been able to convince me that I should avoid even the appearance of IC-OOC mixing, and we could have worked out some sort of compromise or win-win situation.

Instead, you jumped to conclusions and assumed that I was abusing my position. You sent me repeated IC requests for orders, laced with OOC insults. (Not the best way to get your point across.) I ignored the OOC insults and had Enri repeat his orders. When I did not respond to your further harassing messages (because Enri was wounded, and I was busy with work for a few days after he recovered), you threatened to "escalate the matter" and promised that I "will lose badly". When I called you out on it publicly, you asked, I quote, "are you that stupid?" You then dragged me in front of the Magistrates, and here we are.

With all due respect, I believe you owe me an apology.
Title: Re: Accusations of abuse and general harassment
Post by: Fury on December 23, 2012, 12:37:01 PM
How about both apologize and we call this done? Aaron started off with a respectful and friendly PM after all.
Title: Re: Accusations of abuse and general harassment
Post by: Penchant on December 23, 2012, 07:14:24 PM
How about both apologize and we call this done? Aaron started off with a respectful and friendly PM after all.
+1
Title: Re: Accusations of abuse and general harassment
Post by: GoldPanda on December 23, 2012, 10:41:33 PM
Fair enough. I apologize to Aaron for being a jerk to him. That was unwarranted.

The IC conflict is a separate matter, however. If Aaron was a new player, I would be more proactive in giving OOC advice. But Aaron has been playing BM for a while. I'm quite comfortable with saying "your character has a problem, deal with it". If Remi doesn't like his assignment, maybe he could try talking to Enri.
Title: Re: Accusations of abuse and general harassment
Post by: Solari on December 24, 2012, 04:30:47 AM
Fair enough. I apologize to Aaron for being a jerk to him. That was unwarranted.

The IC conflict is a separate matter, however. If Aaron was a new player, I would be more proactive in giving OOC advice. But Aaron has been playing BM for a while. I'm quite comfortable with saying "your character has a problem, deal with it". If Remi doesn't like his assignment, maybe he could try talking to Enri.

I'll try this, and WOULD HAVE tried this, had it seemed possible that something positive could result. Because showering me with negativity based on very, very faulty assumptions and then telling me that you "really aren't interested in anything (I) have to say" didn't inspire confidence. I made it clear fom the beginning that I was willing to work with you to correct this misperception. I'm very eager to put all of this behind me if you're willing to meet me halfway.
Title: Re: Accusations of abuse and general harassment
Post by: Solari on December 24, 2012, 04:53:27 AM
I also think that some clarification is needed w/r/t Thomas, Enri, and Carelia, which we can talk about elsewhere in more detail if you'd like, Yangfan. I'm not sure if the explanation given is IC or OOC, but I pulled Thomas out of Carelia because the dukes and duchesses were either criminally incompetent or outright treasonous. Carelia could have stomped CE early on and gained a precious advantage were it not for those anchors around the realm's neck. The realm stopped being fun, because nobody in a position of authority seemed to care enough, or risk enough, to do anything about it.
Title: Re: Accusations of abuse and general harassment
Post by: Fury on December 24, 2012, 06:53:22 AM
I think Yangfan's already met you halfway.
So now if you go the other half we can call this done.
Title: Re: Accusations of abuse and general harassment
Post by: GoldPanda on December 24, 2012, 11:39:36 AM
I'll try this, and WOULD HAVE tried this, had it seemed possible that something positive could result. Because showering me with negativity based on very, very faulty assumptions and then telling me that you "really aren't interested in anything (I) have to say" didn't inspire confidence. I made it clear fom the beginning that I was willing to work with you to correct this misperception. I'm very eager to put all of this behind me if you're willing to meet me halfway.

The bad OOC feelings started because Enri had to convince the realm council to "purge" at least one suspected spy. Enri is a lot more paranoid and ruthless than I am. He felt that it was perfectly justified, and he was right. I, as a player, was horrified that I was possibly ruining an innocent player's fun.

But that was a long time ago, and CE won in the end. So I suppose I should not hold a grudge against you, Aaron. I've already said what I had to say to you. (In an unfriendly way, for which I already apologized.) I'm honestly not interested in an explanation anymore. In fact, if I did ruin the fun for an innocent player, I'd prefer that you spare me the details. I'd rather not know.

And I assure you that I can keep all the OOC stuff separate from the IC world. That is unfortunate for Remi, because Yangfan the player would definitely go easier on him. I hope that you did not have Remi enter the lions' den expecting sunshine and lollipops, or think that a friendly OOC message will fix anything IC. The Solari family name will be an anchor around his neck for the foreseeable future (if I may borrow your analogy.)

Remi is going to have to do some groveling and endure a lot of hazing if he wants to play for Team CE. I would not expect anything less if I were to, say, make a new character in Sirion. This is a great RP opportunity, Aaron. I recommend that you take advantage of it.
Title: Re: Accusations of abuse and general harassment
Post by: Solari on December 24, 2012, 03:05:04 PM
Remi is going to have to do some groveling and endure a lot of hazing if he wants to play for Team CE. I would not expect anything less if I were to, say, make a new character in Sirion. This is a great RP opportunity, Aaron. I recommend that you take advantage of it.

Sweet. Let's do this.  8)
Title: Re: Accusations of abuse and general harassment
Post by: Bael on December 24, 2012, 08:33:10 PM
I think Yangfan's already met you halfway.
So now if you go the other half we can call this done.
Title: Re: Accusations of abuse and general harassment
Post by: Penchant on December 24, 2012, 08:54:19 PM
Sweet. Let's do this.  8)
I think we can all agree, this case is closed.
Title: Re: Accusations of abuse and general harassment
Post by: Draco Tanos on December 24, 2012, 09:43:13 PM
See, this is the best sort of magistrate case.  Where things resolve themselves.
Title: Re: Accusations of abuse and general harassment
Post by: Fury on December 26, 2012, 08:56:22 AM
Right, if there's nothing else then I'll just close this in a day or two.