Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Anaris

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 376
1
Beluaterra / Re: Sacred Obia'Syela
« on: January 16, 2019, 09:21:31 PM »
Temples absolutely do cap follower count, in ways I've wanted to fix for years but haven't found the time or the math to manage.

2
Development / Re: Longer shelf life of scribe notes
« on: January 16, 2019, 02:57:10 PM »
How useful is it really to have a scout report of a region that's a week old?

By that point, any troops in the region are likely to have moved on.

3
Helpline / Re: Holy Man
« on: January 16, 2019, 12:37:35 AM »
All Character Fame ranking numbers are relative to the continent. I don't know offhand what the Holy Man numbers in particular represent, but nothing on that page can be meaningfully compared across continents on an absolute basis.

4
Feature Requests / Re: Imperial/Hinterland Regions
« on: January 10, 2019, 03:47:30 PM »
"More war" is not an end in itself. "More war" is a means to the end of "more fun."

It is our hope and intention that the changes we are making will lead to "more fun."

5
Feature Requests / Re: Edit function for statues and monuments
« on: January 02, 2019, 05:23:51 AM »
If that is the case, you only need to limit it to the description only and not the actual name of the statues or monuments?

Right, because no one would ever find a way to abuse that...

Triple-check your work, and if mistakes sneak past—as they do sometimes in real life—then live with them.

6
Feature Requests / Re: Edit function for statues and monuments
« on: January 02, 2019, 05:16:42 AM »
This was deliberately left out so that you couldn't just replace every monument you happen to come into stewardship of with one of yourself for free.

I'm adding a note making it clear that you can't edit them to the page where you create them.

7
Feature Requests / Re: Colonial Master!
« on: December 27, 2018, 04:02:12 AM »
I'm sorry, but I can't help but read that as "limit alliances to the size of my own alliance bloc". Lurian bloc members demanding a limit of 33% when their own bloc forms almost exactly 33% rings obnoxious to me, doubly so given they were what caused these alliance blocs to begin with.

Sorry, Chenier, this proposal's been on the table since long before the current Dwilight status.

If there's any particular situation that prompted it, it's the Cagilan bloc on Atamara.

8
Feature Requests / Re: Imperial/Hinterland Regions
« on: December 26, 2018, 03:12:14 PM »
Was it a voluntary choice to implement the TO restrictions below a certain density, before implementing the hintherland feature?

......No, someone held a gun to our heads and forced us to implement that...?

Of course it was a voluntary choice. The TO restrictions are a band-aid that took all of a few minutes to implement; Hinterlands are a major feature branch that might take months, depending on how things go.

9
Feature Requests / Re: Imperial/Hinterland Regions
« on: December 26, 2018, 04:59:28 AM »
Not a joke.

The current hard cutoff on TOs based on player population is adversely affecting gameplay at this time.

Maybe consider it a reminder that this is something we need now much more than we needed it when TOing was more open.

Something like this is now becoming necessary as many realms are hitting the "maximum size" they can expand to.

It's not just "on my list," there is literally only one thing before it. Once I have the Compact Realms mini-project done, this is the next new feature I'll be implementing.

I'm not sure how much clearer I need to be at this point...?

10
Feature Requests / Re: Imperial/Hinterland Regions
« on: December 25, 2018, 03:50:27 PM »
In case this is not a joke:

A version of this is already on our public Developer Roadmap for the near future. We're even calling it Hinterlands.

11
Feature Requests / Re: Brainstorming: More Steward Abilities
« on: December 17, 2018, 06:14:59 PM »
There are a number of things I'd like to give Lords the option to fill automatically from taxes; this is one of them.

12
Feature Requests / Re: Bring back old age penalties
« on: December 17, 2018, 02:07:57 PM »
Nope. We removed this for a reason.

The hypothesized effect of increasing turnover never materialized to the extent that would warrant the feature's existence.

The downside you cite is, in fact, exactly what happened instead.

13
Dwilight / Re: Shameless Astrum Recruitment Thread
« on: December 12, 2018, 02:11:12 PM »
On the other hand, if someone prominent in Astrum holds these as ideals, and people join Astrum expecting them, they can work together to make the things he says true.

If, on the other hand, everyone just says, "Astrum is terrible, don't go there, no one ever does anything," then there's no chance for the realm to improve.

14
Dwilight / Re: Shameless Astrum Recruitment Thread
« on: December 11, 2018, 08:05:45 PM »
When Westgard was founded, it was (as I recall) one of four realms set aside for refugees of the sinking, the other three being in the south of the EC where the ice receded.

If they wanted a PvP realm, they could go to Alara, Minas Nova, or Greater Xavax (as they became). If they wanted to fight monsters, they could join Westgard.

If I recall correctly, there were still several people who didn't pay attention to what they were getting into, and complained about Westgard being all PvE. I don't think they stuck around long.

15
Feature Requests / Re: Activating Shipyards
« on: November 30, 2018, 09:28:02 PM »
What was that intended purpose again? I remember when they were first implemented, but that seems like it was about 5 years ago.

Providing something resembling scout reports of sea zones—basically, giving you some idea of who's on their way toward you from the adjacent sea zones.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 376