Messages

1

East Island / Re: Really Eponlynn?

« on: July 01, 2016, 02:45:49 AM »

When did realms have to have a legit excuse to war one another?

All you have to state is "Me want more land, You give me more land or else..." War commences for land grab.

I don't understand, I mean we use to war sometimes just to war and see who had better strategies or more active players. Battlegroups were much more competitive than they are now.

2

BM General Discussion / Re: Admin/Mod Moderation

« on: July 01, 2016, 02:42:50 AM »

Thread high jacked.

3

BM General Discussion / Re: Stuff about Battlemaster I enjoy.

« on: July 01, 2016, 02:41:43 AM »

Stalks with his hunting knife, while licking his lips think fresh meat 

4

BM General Discussion / Re: What motivate you to first started play Battlemaster?

« on: June 21, 2016, 01:35:15 PM »

August 2003, I came across this game looking for something besides my usual RP games and I stopped here.

5

BM General Discussion / Re: Admin/Mod Moderation

« on: June 21, 2016, 05:44:43 AM »

Vita,

Thank you for the brief insight.

6

Helpline / Re: Bug: Ban removed by ruler doesn't allow protesting after

« on: June 19, 2016, 02:41:48 PM »

Titan 
 
 
 
 
 
 

7

BM General Discussion / Re: Admin/Mod Moderation

« on: June 17, 2016, 01:53:06 AM »

Been about a week hmm, interesting.

8

Roleplaying / Re: Xavax - Judge, Jury, and Executioner

« on: June 08, 2016, 03:56:07 AM »

Did you send this in game on the judges channel? I might have missed it, but this is fitting for a good execution. 

9

BM General Discussion / Re: Admin/Mod Moderation

« on: June 08, 2016, 03:47:44 AM »

Missing two things, I think that are relevant in this. Interpretation is a trivial thing and that it is to each their own, is it not?

I have not I called Gundam a fool (at least not in that thread), that is what you are saying I am calling him, which is your own take on the conversation. I said clearly that he cannot grasp hold of what he types as of recent, in other words he is typing what comes to mind before thinking about ramification or taking it to thought. Though his apology a testament to that.

Moderation below my standard? That hearsay more or less because I am stating the warning I received I believe is unjust, but the moderation on the comment in so called thread I agree with since it was clearly vulgar.

I'm not sure Victor what you are getting at, but you can elaborate more, though I cannot promise I will indulge you every time. Though I would point out constructiveness of this is clearly that we should know how to actually refute a warning if warned and if we are warned we should know by who so we can address it with another party beside just the ambiguous group so then we would need to know who has given out the warning so we can contact another beside the one that action to warn us. Else is it not a system that is just a circle, that has no real solution for warnings being justified rather than being a opinion of a Admin/Mod. Though if it is not done that way then I think it would be wise for the Administration/Moderation of this forum to actually and final explain the process or steps they take.

I'm truly here only to see what Admins, mods, and Dev team will say from what I gather the team is more or less the same and they make up the Titans for the most part. In this instance I'm calling on them for a public answer and not a private message. I don't believe that is to much trouble to ask, even if I am wrong in what I stated I think it is only to their benefit to explain the process they take.

I say this because the magistrate issue ended poorly as it is now gone, titans are always under some type of scrutiny and well the people needs answers. No different than in game when a knights want to understand why their king signs a agreement of alliance with a realm that is not favorable.

10

BM General Discussion / Admin/Mod Moderation

« on: June 07, 2016, 03:59:26 AM »

Well I guess I had the red lettering coming at some point. ugh it is such a pain to quote items, but this week I have a little time. I opened this thread more or less, because of what is stated below since I'm hijacking a thread apparently, which also brings me to a point much later down my list since i'm now a hijacker as well. Also to note is there a appropriate forum to raise a complaint or a suggestion regarding moderation of this forum that is visible to everyone? Don't try to say development board, we know that board really goes no where, but that is a battle for another day and time. Let us begin...

If you have a complaint about a warning from the mods, please message one of them privately. If you have a general complaint about the moderation of the forum, please either message a mod privately or start a separate topic in the appropriate forum, where you lay your grievance out in a rational manner. Do not hijack other threads to complain about the mods. Do not resort to passive-aggressive snide comments about the moderation of the forums.

Let's dive into this complaint, a complaint because it's clear Mods/dev drop the ball from time to time and well your not perfect and neither are we I get that. If we were we wouldn't need this forum (Limbo), so let's get that out of the way. However, a mod or admin, do not know who or rather care, stated I insulted one of them. As outlined below that is clear by such a warning I received from the BM community team in so called thread..

Blue Star,

You have received a warning for insulting other users and/or staff members in regards to the message:
Re: Stegman Hemmings is ruining the conflict.

Do not make posts that are deliberately rude or insulting to moderators or admins.

Please cease these activities and abide by the forum rules otherwise we will take further action.

Regards,
The BattleMaster Community Team.

If one of our moderation/admin team cannot take such a small comment, when it is not directed at neither Wimpie or and particular member of it I grow a bit concerned. I mean did I say "Mods suck" or "Mods play favorites"? Last time I read what I wrote it said nothing of the sort just a factual thing that has occurred based on comments in other threads as well as this one. Also, if you notice cause it will get turned around and well just start spewing post. Stating anything about the forum user was in fact no insulting, besides stating well the obvious though if it is perceived as a insult well i'm sorry, but that's my opinion as of recent and past post.

When has Gundam really had control of what he types? Your just now noticing comments similar to this.... dropping the ball dropping the ball

Well that sums most of it up, i'm sure I can think of more, but let's not over do it on the first day. Let just say if you're going to warn someone I think you should make it clear, which amin/mod who sent the warnint versus another. Why hide under the cloak and shadows of the forum? How do I take a complaint about a warning to someone if I don't know who actually gave me the warning? I don't intend to chat with the one who warned me, i'd rather talk to another. Also probably best to state how a complaint about a warning can be handled in the warning letter sent, makes it a bit easier than doing this whole thread thing.

Just a fishermen simply am casting a line, upon a wooden ship seeing if the last worm will catch some fish.

11

East Island / Re: Stegman Hemmings is ruining the conflict

« on: June 06, 2016, 12:56:19 PM »

[

Blue Star,

You have received a warning for insulting other users and/or staff members in regards to the message:
Re: Stegman Hemmings is ruining the conflict.

Do not make posts that are deliberately rude or insulting to moderators or admins.

Please cease these activities and abide by the forum rules otherwise we will take further action.

Regards,
The BattleMaster Community Team.

Odd a warning that makes sense only if it's partially true It's definitely not my first warning so maybe forum master will make this fun. If you consider saying "dropping the ball, dropping the ball dropping the ball" a insult I am really concerned for our moderators and admins more or less how they take insults so personal now. I mean are your serious giving a warning for saying that now someone is finally addressing what many others have stated in forum, but now it's finally been slighted by a dev team member.

If you are going to pull the old first rule of the forum, remember that's not a insult a insult is what was brought to our attention in the beginning of the thread. If suggesting mods/admins were not doing what they needed to do considered a insult well, I guess this community really has sunk into the grave that it dug itself.

Be respectful of other users. No insulting or derogatory behavior toward other players or forum users.


Do not go gentle into that good night

12

East Island / Re: Stegman Hemmings is ruining the conflict

« on: June 06, 2016, 03:06:51 AM »

When has Gundam really had control of what he types? Your just now noticing comments similar to this.... dropping the ball dropping the ball

13

East Island / Re: East Continent Concerns About Xavax and Perdan

« on: June 06, 2016, 03:05:24 AM »

Butt Hurt, Butt Hurt, Butt Hurt


 

14

East Island / Re: Stegman Hemmings is ruining the conflict

« on: June 05, 2016, 03:52:09 AM »

This made me smile

15

Atamara / Re: Atamara's Fate

« on: May 14, 2016, 05:39:24 AM »

While the discussion goes on, please allow me ask something.

The League's main opposition was Darka and their allies. They were strong. Why did the Devs decide to eliminate Darka and allies artificially? Why didn't the Devs do the same to CE and Strombran coast and left Darka and BoM untouched? Making CE alliance weak by freezing their regions would have made the game play interesting and would have kept the two sides in competition.

(Conspiracy theory: I feel that Devs did that with a purpose to test the wisdom of leaders of League nations. They wanted to see what the League will do when left alone on an island (a genius plan). Of course, the League failed the test. Why the Devs wanted to do this experiment is a mystery.)

That's actually a simply answer AT being sunk was a thought long ago because of it's problems the only reason it remained because so many old char's/players were on the island still, then the # started to drop off so Ice then it came to sinking. If you look back at older threads about the island clear talk of sinking it is there. I think really it was inevitable. If you can recall it used to be talk of EI and AT for sinking, FEI no clue really never was a fan, but hey EI is still around.

Prepare the Battle Groups! Troop leaders get your men ready to march! Blow the Trumpets and Horns, Onward to the Sea..