Messages

31

Development / Re: This should not happen

« on: December 15, 2012, 08:17:54 PM »

-When a realm loses its last region it should default all diplomatic stances to neutral because it's pointless to have peasants mad about foreign policy with a realm that doesn't exist. It would be like people protesting the Vietnam war in 1980 or demanding we nuke the Soviet Union. It would be even more ridiculous to ask players to spend time on diplomacy with non existent realms, that would be like present day United States having an ambassador to Yugoslavia

Actually, it makes quite sense that people keep hating the government that made previous treaty, even if they are no more. Following your example, people still protested for the Vietnam war in 1980, even now the whole thing tainted the USA irreparably.

People sometime remembers

32

Dwilight / Re: Kabrinskia, Astrum, and other such stuff of the North Western Astroist states.

« on: December 02, 2012, 03:03:59 AM »

As a new player, especially if you are an old one coming back, it's almost always easier and funnier starting in a realm at war since you have more in-game things that helps roleplay, more possibily fast promotions due conquests and there are usually more letters and roleplays in the air.



Also this terrible change that prevent you from having 3 active nobles from the start "forces" you to farm prestige to gain fame... It was better when it just required making your information public

33

BM General Discussion / Re: Another Name ?

« on: November 03, 2012, 12:58:17 PM »

I'd pick somthing along the line of
"Clash of Realms"
"A game of fates"
"The Struggle for fame"
"Machiavelli"

Blood & Power sounds too cheap to me