If Allomere had instead simply reiterated the order, and added, "and if you don't, there will be consequences," that would have been fine.
The problem is, he said, "and if you don't by tonight, there will be consequences." That's not fine.
You're acting like there's only one possible way for Allomere to have given Fal'Cie one last chance. It's simply not true.
No, I am not sayint that it is one possible way for Allomere to have given Fal'Cie one last chance... naturaly that there were many diferent ways he could do it.
But
this is trial about have he violated Inalienable Rights - and
duo to the matter of the trial the essential point is in the fact that his intention was not to punish someone for inactivity (what would be violating of the rule) but to give the last chance to reconsider to one who expressed intention to disobey the order (what is not violation of the rule).
Those who created rules had intention to protect players from beeing punished for inactivity, not from beeing punished for disobeying rules and especially not to punish players for giving secon chance simply because of hot tempered expressing. Dont you think so?
