The thing is a good general with 10k CS would be perfectly capable of destroy an army of 20k CS with a very poor leadership!
Right now, a difference of 20-25% is almost for sure, decisive... Generals win or loss battles! not only are managers of victories and defeats... and if we have something called leadership, why not to use it?... It's only a game mechanism? well... all Battles are pure game mechanism, right now!
about aiming... of course I can't know what are Tom is aiming, but I can tell what I'm aiming... to try to help to make BM more 'realistic'... and more enjoyable, funny and alive!
