Author Topic: Sanguis Astroism  (Read 1026166 times)

Indirik

  • Exalted Emperor
  • ******
  • Posts: 10849
  • No pressure, no diamonds.
    • View Profile
Re: Sanguis Astroism
« Reply #3270: July 22, 2013, 06:47:55 PM »
That happened while I was unable to do more than Quickplay for a period of four or so days. I personally had no intention of reading 450+ messages to dive into the whole thing.

It is being reacted to, just slowly.
If at first you don't succeed, don't take up skydiving.

Frostwood

  • Noble Lord
  • ***
  • Posts: 146
    • View Profile
Re: Sanguis Astroism
« Reply #3271: July 22, 2013, 07:54:50 PM »
The thing I tried to start was with a letter to Constantine, who promptly ignored it so eh.

I've got a whole like book of stuff written (on the wiki), not having anything to do with the splitting or whatever, but no one's read it (as far as I know) let alone let it spark any dialogue at all. If there really are partisan sides, zealous and uncomfortable topics... nobody's mentioned them. Even Jonsu proclaiming herself Regent provoked a big "meh" reaction. I don't think any of the Elders even noticed. Everyone's asleep.
I've read your stuff, after all my character is interested in prophecies.  As far as debate about prophecy, I'm doing it quietly.

As your character mentioned earlier, people are afraid to debate on faith in fear of uniting one side against them, thus the lack of debate.
Characters:Lain Frostwood, Ghostfire Frostwood, Talia(commoner)

Chenier

  • Exalted Emperor
  • ******
  • Posts: 8120
    • View Profile
Re: Sanguis Astroism
« Reply #3272: July 22, 2013, 10:30:07 PM »
The elders probably don't want to make a fuss about Jonsu, because they can't actually do anything to her, and thus it'd be a battle they can't win.
Dit donc camarade soleil / Ne trouves-tu ça pas plutôt con / De donner une journée pareil / À un patron

Indirik

  • Exalted Emperor
  • ******
  • Posts: 10849
  • No pressure, no diamonds.
    • View Profile
Re: Sanguis Astroism
« Reply #3273: July 22, 2013, 11:57:47 PM »
Oh no, that's not it at all. It will move forward. The vote is already started, and it is pretty clear which way it will go.

Have fun, Daycryn. ;)
If at first you don't succeed, don't take up skydiving.

Daycryn

  • Noble Lord
  • ***
  • Posts: 353
    • View Profile
Re: Sanguis Astroism
« Reply #3274: July 24, 2013, 06:49:20 AM »
Oh no, that's not it at all. It will move forward. The vote is already started, and it is pretty clear which way it will go.

Have fun, Daycryn. ;)

Oh dear.

I think Rabisu just needs to stay away from priestesses in the future. Never turns out good.
Lokenth, Warrior of Arcaea, former Adventurer
Adamir, Lord of Luria Nova

Chenier

  • Exalted Emperor
  • ******
  • Posts: 8120
    • View Profile
Re: Sanguis Astroism
« Reply #3275: July 24, 2013, 12:36:58 PM »
Is LN's judge even of SA? Does this mean that, when dealing with non-SA realms, a non-SA noble would have a 1/3 say on whether people are heretics or not?
Dit donc camarade soleil / Ne trouves-tu ça pas plutôt con / De donner une journée pareil / À un patron

vonGenf

  • Honourable King
  • *****
  • Posts: 2331
    • View Profile
Re: Sanguis Astroism
« Reply #3276: July 24, 2013, 12:50:23 PM »
Is LN's judge even of SA?

Yes, she is.
After all it's a roleplaying game.

Chenier

  • Exalted Emperor
  • ******
  • Posts: 8120
    • View Profile
Re: Sanguis Astroism
« Reply #3277: July 24, 2013, 12:58:17 PM »
Yes, she is.

If she had not been, would she have been made a magistrate anyways?

Seems a little silly to use the judge rule with non-theocracies...
Dit donc camarade soleil / Ne trouves-tu ça pas plutôt con / De donner une journée pareil / À un patron

vonGenf

  • Honourable King
  • *****
  • Posts: 2331
    • View Profile
Re: Sanguis Astroism
« Reply #3278: July 24, 2013, 01:17:06 PM »
If she had not been, would she have been made a magistrate anyways?

Seems a little silly to use the judge rule with non-theocracies...

The rules say no.
After all it's a roleplaying game.

Vita`

  • BM Dev Team
  • Honourable King
  • *
  • Posts: 2558
    • View Profile
Re: Sanguis Astroism
« Reply #3279: July 24, 2013, 05:34:23 PM »
I *think* Lucini is a novice, not a full member.

Daycryn

  • Noble Lord
  • ***
  • Posts: 353
    • View Profile
Re: Sanguis Astroism
« Reply #3280: July 24, 2013, 05:58:57 PM »
An Aspirant, actually.
Lokenth, Warrior of Arcaea, former Adventurer
Adamir, Lord of Luria Nova

Indirik

  • Exalted Emperor
  • ******
  • Posts: 10849
  • No pressure, no diamonds.
    • View Profile
Re: Sanguis Astroism
« Reply #3281: July 24, 2013, 06:11:10 PM »
If she had not been, would she have been made a magistrate anyways?

Seems a little silly to use the judge rule with non-theocracies...
No, she would not have been. In that case, I *think* the charter says that the Lights pick a suitable alternative. You'd have to go check the wiki to be sure.
If at first you don't succeed, don't take up skydiving.

vonGenf

  • Honourable King
  • *****
  • Posts: 2331
    • View Profile
Re: Sanguis Astroism
« Reply #3282: July 24, 2013, 06:15:11 PM »
No, she would not have been. In that case, I *think* the charter says that the Lights pick a suitable alternative. You'd have to go check the wiki to be sure.

The charter actually says nothing whatsoever about how to pick magistrates. There is a parallel set of rules written here:

http://wiki.battlemaster.org/wiki/Sanguis_Astroism/The_Magistratum

Is it binding? Who knows!
After all it's a roleplaying game.

Indirik

  • Exalted Emperor
  • ******
  • Posts: 10849
  • No pressure, no diamonds.
    • View Profile
Re: Sanguis Astroism
« Reply #3283: July 24, 2013, 06:19:30 PM »
Oh. Derp. I should have known that, I wrote it... :(
If at first you don't succeed, don't take up skydiving.

Hroppa

  • Knight
  • **
  • Posts: 48
    • View Profile
Re: Sanguis Astroism
« Reply #3284: July 24, 2013, 06:35:16 PM »
I know that I skip most messages from SA these days.

Makes me wonder if there might not be a readership for a newsletter summarising the week's communications in SA...