Author Topic: The Terran-Kabrinskian Conflict  (Read 239939 times)

Darksun

  • Noble Lord
  • ***
  • Posts: 205
    • View Profile
    • Bucksplace
Re: The Terran-Kabrinskian Conflict
« Reply #180: April 14, 2012, 07:04:22 PM »
Really?

Interesting.

I can almost see the smoke over here as Vellos re-crunches the numbers and assumptions that he has made for this war.

Vellos

  • Honourable King
  • *****
  • Posts: 3736
  • Stodgy Old Man in Training
    • View Profile
Re: The Terran-Kabrinskian Conflict
« Reply #181: April 14, 2012, 10:33:41 PM »
I can almost see the smoke over here as Vellos re-crunches the numbers and assumptions that he has made for this war.

Heh.

Yeah... Terran is taking a while to really get going here. But we'll see.
"A neutral humanism is either a pedantic artifice or a prologue to the inhuman." - George Steiner

Glaumring the Fox

  • Honourable King
  • *****
  • Posts: 2082
  • Nothing
    • View Profile
Re: The Terran-Kabrinskian Conflict
« Reply #182: April 14, 2012, 11:19:31 PM »
The whole Zuma incident a few weeks ago was a massive blessing for Asylon. It gave me the excuse to push for Asylon to be on constant war footing, by the time the war started Asylon didnt need to prepare too much.
We live lives in beautiful lies...

Vellos

  • Honourable King
  • *****
  • Posts: 3736
  • Stodgy Old Man in Training
    • View Profile
Re: The Terran-Kabrinskian Conflict
« Reply #183: April 14, 2012, 11:37:08 PM »
The whole Zuma incident a few weeks ago was a massive blessing for Asylon. It gave me the excuse to push for Asylon to be on constant war footing, by the time the war started Asylon didnt need to prepare too much.

Yeah, Terran's refit times are big, but I'm pretty sure we have a significant advantage over Kabrinskia in terms of raw mobile firepower, just a long march to get to the front. :p
"A neutral humanism is either a pedantic artifice or a prologue to the inhuman." - George Steiner

Feylonis

  • Noble Lord
  • ***
  • Posts: 336
    • View Profile
Re: The Terran-Kabrinskian Conflict
« Reply #184: April 15, 2012, 09:47:02 AM »
The capital move from Echiur to Via really helped, too. We can strike Kabrinskia's western borders in at least two turns.

Perth

  • Honourable King
  • *****
  • Posts: 2037
  • Current Character: Kemen
    • View Profile
Re: The Terran-Kabrinskian Conflict
« Reply #185: April 15, 2012, 10:04:36 AM »
Yeah, Terran's refit times are big, but I'm pretty sure we have a significant advantage over Kabrinskia in terms of raw mobile firepower, just a long march to get to the front. :p

And if Asylon covers our border while we refit it shouldn't be too much of a problem.
"A tale is but half told when only one person tells it." - The Saga of Grettir the Strong
- Current: Kemen (D'hara) - Past: Kerwin (Eston), Kale (Phantaria, Terran, Melodia)

Indirik

  • Exalted Emperor
  • ******
  • Posts: 10849
  • No pressure, no diamonds.
    • View Profile
Re: The Terran-Kabrinskian Conflict
« Reply #186: April 15, 2012, 03:39:48 PM »
Why does it matter where Asylon's capital is in relation to Kabrinskia? King Glaumring has already stated they won't attack Kabrinskian land.
If at first you don't succeed, don't take up skydiving.

JPierreD

  • Mighty Duke
  • ****
  • Posts: 1174
  • Hippiemancer Extraordinaire
    • View Profile
Re: The Terran-Kabrinskian Conflict
« Reply #187: April 15, 2012, 04:50:44 PM »
Why does it matter where Asylon's capital is in relation to Kabrinskia? King Glaumring has already stated they won't attack Kabrinskian land.

Only if they don't get attacked.
d'Arricarrère Family: Torpius (All around Dwilight), Felicie (Riombara), Frederic (Riombara) and Luc (Eponllyn).

Gustav Kuriga

  • Guest
Re: The Terran-Kabrinskian Conflict
« Reply #188: April 15, 2012, 04:59:12 PM »
We're not going to be stupid and get ourselves outmatched more than we already are...

Geronus

  • Honourable King
  • *****
  • Posts: 2332
  • Dum dee dum dee dum
    • View Profile
Re: The Terran-Kabrinskian Conflict
« Reply #189: April 15, 2012, 05:03:38 PM »
You're assuming that no one tries to intentionally cause an incident. A dangerous assumption.

Kellaine

  • Noble Lord
  • ***
  • Posts: 342
  • Honor in Service
    • View Profile
    • Thatcher  Family
Re: The Terran-Kabrinskian Conflict
« Reply #190: April 15, 2012, 08:12:42 PM »
You're assuming that no one tries to intentionally cause an incident. A dangerous assumption.

No, we are assuming that someone will but it wont be one of ours.
Dexter - Principality of Zonasa, Telgar - Principality of Zonasa, Wil - Morek Empire, Crom- Adventurer - Kabrinskia-paused

OFaolain

  • Noble Lord
  • ***
  • Posts: 252
    • View Profile
Re: The Terran-Kabrinskian Conflict
« Reply #191: April 15, 2012, 08:38:11 PM »
You're assuming that no one tries to intentionally cause an incident. A dangerous assumption.

Which could get Astrum involved (as long as it's not a Kabrinskian); it'd be a tough gambit for the moot to take.
MacGeil Family: Cathan (Corsanctum)
Formerly the O'Faolain, then Nisbet families

Glaumring the Fox

  • Honourable King
  • *****
  • Posts: 2082
  • Nothing
    • View Profile
Re: The Terran-Kabrinskian Conflict
« Reply #192: April 15, 2012, 09:59:24 PM »
Asylon stands by its commitment to a defensive war. Any escalation  not be intentional on our part.
We live lives in beautiful lies...

Bael

  • Mighty Duke
  • ****
  • Posts: 1022
  • Have sword, will travel!
    • View Profile
Re: The Terran-Kabrinskian Conflict
« Reply #193: April 15, 2012, 10:01:51 PM »
I must admit...it is very odd to see all this politicking on the forums...very odd...

Geronus

  • Honourable King
  • *****
  • Posts: 2332
  • Dum dee dum dee dum
    • View Profile
Re: The Terran-Kabrinskian Conflict
« Reply #194: April 15, 2012, 10:54:24 PM »
I suppose it's inevitable. Of course here we can talk about OOC things that our characters might not even know about IG.