[Forum Game] World in Revolution 1861, Sign-up Thread

[Vellos]

Beautiful.

[Perth]

Regional info has been sent out.

Remember, don't be surprised that Ind, Infra, and Income stats have been done away with for regional values. Now you should just be getting Stability, Population, and Troop/Navy numbers. The rest was unnecessary.

[Muskeato]

Excellent update. I just noticed that my number of regulars has halved, I guess that happened when you rejigged the stats? Good thing I ordered more troops.

[Spectre17]

Great Update Perth. Also If I wanted to negotiate with NPC nations I talk to Perth right?

[Lefanis]

Great update  Are we going to get those little mini updates too, once in a while? 

And I remember seeing on the paradox forum a chart showing what army level corresponded to which technology. Does someone have a link to it?

[Spectre17]

That is the naval chart. I don't think there is an Army one. http://forum.paradoxplaza.com/forum/showthread.php?583446-Forum-Game-World-in-Revolution-1861/page273 It's right at the bottom.

[Frymonmon]

Japanese soldiers in the United States?

Does the USA player have a death wish?

[Tom]

Japanese soldiers in the United States?

Does the USA player have a death wish?

Definitely an interesting change from real-world history. And while my american history isn't too detailed (hey, I'm european, what do I care for what state joined which side?) it does seem to me that things are already taking a different course.

[Duke of Britain]

This won't end well...not for the US, not for Japan...

[Dante Silverfire]

This won't end well...not for the US, not for Japan...

You never know. Only time will tell. History can be changed, times can be different.

[Muskeato]

You never know. Only time will tell. History can be changed, times can be different.

The lack of infrastructure to support 200,000 however can't be changed so easily

[vonGenf]

The lack of infrastructure to support 200,00 however can't be changed so easily

I am also skeptic about the capability of the Japanese navy to transport 200'000 soldiers across the pacific, to be honest.....

[JPierreD]

I am also skeptic about the capability of the Japanese navy to transport 200'000 soldiers across the pacific, to be honest.....

It would be the Russian navy, I guess. The Japanese is completely incapable, and the Russian would have to make several trips.

[Vellos]

I am also skeptic about the capability of the Japanese navy to transport 200'000 soldiers across the pacific, to be honest.....

I'm skeptical about the need for 200,000 soldiers in California. The biggest battles out west had less than 20,000 soldiers on both sides combined.

[Dante Silverfire]

I'm skeptical about the need for 200,000 soldiers in California. The biggest battles out west had less than 20,000 soldiers on both sides combined.

I know, now wouldn't it sway battles then if one side had 200,000 while the other had 20,000? History does change then wouldn't it?

And yes, the Japanese Navy isn't the strongest, but its allies have stronger navies at the current time.