What will be done about it......
It wasn't explicitly mentioned in the judgement, but Tom did mention in one of the various threads on the matter that he was thinking that the minimum time allowed before re-emigrating to the point of departure (in this case, Fontan or Aurvandil) was one year, but there were conditions attached to it. That way the judgement would have been served properly.
Either way, as Vellos has suggested, a case has been started.
