+1
It should. If someone doesn't back his case, and the case is not slam-dunk out of itself, then it should be dropped. Why? Because it can't be all that important.
Tom, your first reply, sent 13 minutes after the case was posted, was that this
was a slam-dunk case.
I'm not saying the magistrates shouldn't render a decision. They have material to base themselves on, and of course they can't base themselves on material they don't have. Is it really worthwhile to pressure them more?
