Author Topic: Accusation of "gold hoarding"  (Read 7383 times)

Penchant

  • Honourable King
  • *****
  • Posts: 3121
    • View Profile
Re: Accusation of "gold hoarding"
« Reply #15: March 09, 2013, 07:53:35 PM »
He's done something wrong. You gave him a chance to explain, and he did not. So ban him because he's done something wrong.

Why would you ignore the wrong thing he's done and proceed to ban him for refusal to reply? That is going out of your way to make certain you are as close as possible to a IR violation.

The character has violated the law of your realm. He has actively disregarded a direct order. Not responding does not make him immune from suffering the consequences of his actions.
*facepalms* Yeah you are kinda right, the point was, the actions by themselves were not worthy in the eyes of the judge it seems as they were willing to accept the actions if there was a proper explanation, but they refused to reply, ie explain their actions, thus he is going to be banned.
“The true soldier fights not because he hates what is in front of him, but because he loves what is behind him.”
― G.K. Chesterton

egamma

  • Guest
Re: Accusation of "gold hoarding"
« Reply #16: March 10, 2013, 03:05:58 PM »
A refusal to reply when they know he's been active. That's close to an IR violation, in fact that's textbook for avoiding one.

Not at all. If they know he's active, then it cannot be an activity-related ban. It's that simple.

Gustav Kuriga

  • Guest
Re: Accusation of "gold hoarding"
« Reply #17: March 11, 2013, 12:20:55 AM »
Not at all. If they know he's active, then it cannot be an activity-related ban. It's that simple.

That should say *That's not close*.