Here's another thought about medals. Are they as important in the long term? Do they
really tell you anything about a player? I wouldn't, for example, say anyone should take my stack of medals at face value. The vast majority of my medals, I earned in the first few years of playing BattleMaster. In the last couple of years, I've earned one or two. No more than that.
I know the community is smaller now than it once was, but it seems if I was playing in the same manner today as I did some years ago, that I would have more medals. Okay, my current medals might show I have past form, but I don't RP as much now. There are lengthy periods in my play where I'm not really engaging with anyone.
Should medals represent the absolute
potential of players for fun/trustworthiness/roleplay or should they be more a record of consistently good play in the fullness of time? Maybe medals should expire after a year or two in order to better reward continous efforts at being a good player?
It is not supposed to be a measure of characters. Also, lack of medals is not supposed to be a black mark against someone.
True, but having medals is much more reassuring medals than not having them. If I encounter a player who has been kicking out about as long as I have and they don't have any medals, it's hard to imagine that they engage with the game in a way that enriches other players experiences. I think you can make broad generalisations from the presence/absence of medals and sometimes it does affect your opinion.
Perhaps it would be useful to have an "Are you sure?" check?
If I recall correct, Tom's never been a big fan of offering such notifications. Though that would definitely be helpful.