What about more complex cases, such as the obvious infiltrator in the same region as a noble, yet he is 'not identified' after the attack? We all know who did it, but he wasn't actually caught... Does it become metagaming to link the attacker through a scribe report placing him in the region?
Or torture reports, where it is impossible for the information itself to be fake unless it was fake for the original recipient?
You guys have said basically what I was thinking, but I've seen it played differently. "Should" doesn't always translate into "does".
