This case has a precedent.
This is actually somewhat persuasive. Based on this Titan ruling, I am willing to change my opinion from "definitely illegal" to "on the fence."
I
feel like there's a material difference in the Isadril case, but at present, I can't put it into words, so it may not be that different after all.
If I find a way to articulate it, I'll be sure to post it here
