I want to be fair thus i will say that last night i was on irc myself and in the East Island channel Jason asked to let the player of Edvard know this has nothing to do with him, that he actually enjoyed him as a player and that in another time he would actually find this as an amusing challenge.
For the sake of saying the truth i believe this should be written here.A rage quit is an assumption when the player declares it is not.
It is unfair towards the player of Edvard making him think he is the reason of this quit when Jason clearly stated it is not and asked that this was noted to him.
My 1 cent..cause i don't have 2.
Very well, I take then the reason of "rage quit" back.
Jason is not talking with me, so being the main target of his message, I could only assume.
The player of Edvard knows this of course as well, Jason sent via Aiden the message to all rulers as well.
