This way it will though make it more difficult for the volunteer moderators to handle things, as they must always discuss verdicts and then justify them and then there is whining and then and then and then...endless food for rules lawyers.
As Tom says, there are no verdicts. There is no discussion of verdicts. There is no justification or arguing. No one who has a moderator action taken against them will even know who did it, unless the moderator reveals their name in the process of taking the action. If anyone has issues with the moderator's actions, they can protest to Tom. Or, as some have done in the past, to me or Tim.
We keep this nice and simple. Action gets taken faster, and stuff gets dealt with quickly.
