See, the 5-6 people ingame are elected by many more people.
Why? Because they have obviously some talents. Experience. Leadership. Visions.
So these elected people have much more knowledge in what is best for their realms than most of your forum people.
They are there every day, know the continent, the people who play on it and everything that is relevant to it.
You should have left the discussion therefore better to them, they are much more civil and productive than this forum could ever be.
Instead you come here and complain how bad everything is. Let's cry everyone a bit. But solutions? Nothing.
So again, leave some things ingame to the people who care, know and are competent enough.
Because incompetent people do not get elected in Battlemaster usually. Usually.
Wow... how nice of you to consider that pretty much everyone on the forum is too incompetent to discuss the game.
This entire attitude is so elitist and ridiculously wrong, that I can't even comprehend how you could advocate this, let alone believe. Only the very few people who *currently* have a character as an elected ruler have any right to discuss the state of the game? Only those very few people get to take part in the shaping the play experience for every player in the entire game? You must consider every single player in the game to be nothing more than sheeple who exist for no purpose other than to follow your orders.
Quit talking, go look for the red paper!The people participating on the forum play in these realms every single day, too. They participate in the events that shape the entire game. They are the ones that most acutely feel the effects of the decisions made at the highest political levels. The fact that you think these people should just be quiet and take whatever scraps you let them have is just appalling.
If you don't want to have a productive discussion about the game here on the forum, then don't come here. Let the people who are actually interested in working out solutions to problems, actually do so without your elitist obstructionism.