Korlok isn't comparable so there isn't a moral high ground in that argument.
It most certainly is comparable. A rich, fortified townsland adjacent to the enemy's capital, and a sticking point in negotiations. It pretty effectively bottles Ikalak up, and keeps them north of the river. Gives Sandalak a great launching point for an assault on Ikalak city itself. It's *more* important to Sandalak that Toren Stronghold, which is overrated.
See, I think there is an interest in playing fair.
Fair play? Yes.
Second guessing every event that happens, so we can analyze it to figure out whether or not it's fair to keep on playing? No thanks.
If the devs are going to take action and intervene in the game, then they will do it no matter whether the players get together and decide on an OOC cease-fire or not. The players' default action in all circumstances should be to play the hand you're dealt. This holds true whether the situation screws you, like it did Taselak, or showers you with sunshine and daisies like Ikalak.
