Author Topic: Titan decision enforcement: what's acceptable?  (Read 15847 times)

Chenier

  • Exalted Emperor
  • ******
  • Posts: 8120
    • View Profile
Titan decision enforcement: what's acceptable?
« Topic Start: November 19, 2014, 06:06:53 PM »
To give context, recently, the titans stripped Ravenice Plavereen, King of Caelum (BT) of his titles of Duke of the Desert Stronghold, and lord of Watto, which it appears he is not to reclaim for 30 days. The reason for which was because he kept switching titles around and using temporary lordships.

This verdict brings a few questions.

The first of which is: is leaving the positions vacant for 30 days, to then reclaim them for himself, in line with the spirit of the judgement? If he does this, which he explicitly stated he would, he basically loses nothing. He's still the ruler, so he has full power over who gets to be dukes, so in 30 days he'll be duke of the largest duchy and lord of the richest region once again.

The second of which: would giving his second character, currently margrave of the capital, either of these titles be in line with the judgement? Titans regulate player behavior, yet the punishment are often targeted against characters more than players. If the player can simply transfer the lost titles to his second character, then he wouldn't have lost anything at all. Indeed, it's be pretty akin to the title shuffling he got punished for to begin with.
Dit donc camarade soleil / Ne trouves-tu ça pas plutôt con / De donner une journée pareil / À un patron