Ete City

[Zakilevo]

After spending over 14,000 gold, I have built 5 decent RCs

Selisian Arbalests   Special Forces   80   80-5 / 70
Selisian Rangers   Archers   50   65-4 / 80
Selisian Armoured Guards   Infantry   65   65 / 75
Selisian Ember Guards   Infantry   45   80 / 65
Selisian Black Guards   Mixed Infantry   60   90-3 / 75

Not sure how much more gold I will spend but it seems it is getting pretty damn hard to build RCs after 5... Now I need to save up for 2 weeks to try once.

[Chenier]

After spending over 14,000 gold, I have built 5 decent RCs

Selisian Arbalests   Special Forces   80   80-5 / 70
Selisian Rangers   Archers   50   65-4 / 80
Selisian Armoured Guards   Infantry   65   65 / 75
Selisian Ember Guards   Infantry   45   80 / 65
Selisian Black Guards   Mixed Infantry   60   90-3 / 75

Not sure how much more gold I will spend but it seems it is getting pretty damn hard to build RCs after 5... Now I need to save up for 2 weeks to try once.

I don't really like your archers. I do like the MI and SF a lot though.

[Fleugs]

I don't really like your archers. I do like the MI and SF a lot though.

This. I think the archers would be better off with more equipment and equal/less armour?
I'm really interested in that MI though, it looks... elite? Can we start saying that for mixed infantry now? 

[GundamMerc]

This. I think the archers would be better off with more equipment and equal/less armour?
I'm really interested in that MI though, it looks... elite? Can we start saying that for mixed infantry now? 

MI is actually better than you think. :3

[Zakilevo]

You people are underestimating my archers!

Wish it was the other way around though. 80/65 not 65/80...

[Chenier]

You people are underestimating my archers!

Wish it was the other way around though. 80/65 not 65/80...

I'd rather 75/50 than 65/80. With archers, I want firepower. The moment their armor really matters, you probably already lost the battle anyways.

[Indirik]

The moment their armor really matters, you probably already lost the battle anyways.

That's not true. I've seen a few battles that were determined by one side's archers getting wiped out too fast, allowing the other side to start firing into combat much quicker. Armor is *always* useful.

[De-Legro]

That's not true. I've seen a few battles that were determined by one side's archers getting wiped out too fast, allowing the other side to start firing into combat much quicker. Armor is *always* useful.

Yes it can be very handy to win Archer Duels

[GundamMerc]

As Luria probably just found out to their chagrin. Well, that and don't mess with Grandmistress Eviera's archer spam of doom. :3

[Zakilevo]

Enweil at one point only had archers. They did have some good archer centers though. With some luck they even managed to repel Rio's infantry+SF army. Good days.

[Chenier]

That's not true. I've seen a few battles that were determined by one side's archers getting wiped out too fast, allowing the other side to start firing into combat much quicker. Armor is *always* useful.

Armor is sometimes useful. Weapons are always useful.

[De-Legro]

Armor is sometimes useful. Weapons are always useful.

Both play into CS, which has various effects at all times. Armor is useful for more things other then stopping a blow.

[Zakilevo]

Armor is sometimes useful. Weapons are always useful.

Armor and weapon are interchangeable I believe for now. Which Tim will change in time.

[Chenier]

Armor and weapon are interchangeable I believe for now. Which Tim will change in time.

Seriously?

[Anaris]

Seriously?

Weeeelll...it's not quite that bad. But there are places in the code where, effectively, increasing your armour increases your damage.

I don't think there are any places where increasing your weapons makes you harder to hit, but I wouldn't be willing to swear to it.