Author Topic: Really Eponlynn?  (Read 37935 times)

Gabanus family

  • Board Moderator
  • Mighty Duke
  • *
  • Posts: 1340
    • View Profile
Re: Really Eponlynn?
« Reply #105: July 09, 2016, 10:06:04 PM »
i actually agree fully, but then what do you want? people complain when you destroy a realm, people complain when you cripple a realm, people basically complain about any form of loss. you knew what you were getting into when you signed up, this isnt a text based version of wow where all movement is forward no matter how bad you screw up.

like it or not and whether certain devs agree or not bm is not just a competitive game, but an intensely competitive game by its very nature. you have competition within realms for titles and competition between realms over lands. remove that competition and you may as well be running an rp forum. object to that competition and youre fighting against human nature.

As long as Eponllyn can keep it's nobles moral high enough they have enough of a fighting chance actually to grow bigger again. I think this is always better than complete destruction. Also of course there should be loss for stupid mistakes, or even for ballsy moves, but what frustrates me the most personally is the risk aversion tactic that most people apply when they're only willing to start a war when they know from the start that they will dominate another realm. Such is competitive yes, but one that does frustrate me tbh. It in part let to Atamara's situation and EC may well follow suit if we let things play out for another year or so and that's the only thing that worries me on EC. Not so much whether or not Oligarch falls, but the great clumps of alliances deadlocking everything.
New account active chars:
Garas: First Oligarch - Goriad: Astrum - Goriad II: Obia'Syela