Author Topic: Rethinking the rules  (Read 10070 times)

De-Legro

  • Honourable King
  • *****
  • Posts: 3838
    • View Profile
Re: Rethinking the rules
« Reply #15: February 08, 2019, 02:16:13 AM »
You are forgetting the fact the game doesn't allow you to hold on to multiple holdings. If this game allowed people to hold multiple lordships, I doubt people would be 'dumping' their titles as you put them.

No I am not. Trading up is trading up. Trading up from badlands to decent farmlands or a town. Just cycling to whatever region needs a lord/work is not trading up regardless. If someone is abandoning their region to get a quantifiably bettesr one, no one complains. Hell it is common practise for  say when a city comes up. The case mentioned was different it was specifically said the player was taking on regions that needed work, fixing them and moving on to the next challenge.

Don't pull the bull!@#$ about immersion and RL. Games don't need to accurately reflect RL in order to have immersion. Immersion is about internal consistency. All simulations make compromises. BM has its own "stylised" medieval feel. Keeping to that brings about immersion. If Immersion had anything to do with RL people would not be able to be immersed in fantasy games, LARPS etc.
Previously of the De-Legro Family
Now of representation unknown.