Despana forgot the part where the commoner was declared a noble without without using the game mechanics to do so and was declared Ranias Heir. As for accusing fornication with a commoner or Daimon, no not quite....
That's only peripherally relevant to the case at hand—which, if what D'Espana says is true, does not actually involve Zebidiah being declared a commoner in any significant sense.
Please stick to the facts of the matter currently under consideration. With that in mind, are there any substantial parts of D'Espana's explanation that you would care to concisely dispute?
