I don't accept this characterisation at all. Polar Raven's use of inverted commas is perfectly reasonable. This was very much the case of realms finding common cause/enemy on a singular issue.
Are you saying you do not refer to it as a federation or coalition? If I were to link in evidence of you doing so, would that make you change your story? Are you also claiming you did not join because you were requested too?
Yet you respond to this by saying you didn't regard OS as being in the same block/behaviour?
OS has fought against people in that alliance block. SV has not. Having common ground in one war makes sense, having an unofficial alliance so that you side with them on all, does not. OS fighting against people in the block aswell shows dynamic relations. Always siding with the same people shows the inverse.
The problem comes in that you made an OOC decision to forsake diplomacy, Irondale made a decision to go heavy on generating common cause diplomacy
"You made an OOC decision to prioritise continent health over personal strength, Irondale chose themselves."
If this war was going to be so much in Irondale's interests "fun" wise or otherwise, you failed to even make that case to them.
It was made very clear. You just weren't in the discussion as I was not aware a neutral realm leader would have to be involved in all talks.
The rest of your comment is just personal attacks against me so I wont bother with that.
