Let me get this straight: the Moot and the SA (I know, not a crusade, but whatever) go to war against Aurvandil. Luria was asked to help, but instead it declared war on D'Hara (a Moot realm). Not a move that really warms up the trust issues.
Now LN claims to want peace so that it can go help in the war against Aurvandil, and claims that D'Hara is the one that's at fault - when the whole mess could have been avoided had LN just supported the war against Aurvandil in the first place. And LN expects the Moot and SA to somehow trust them this time, despite the fact that it was LN who started the war anyway?
:|
No. I can see how that would make sense if one ignores the fact that the Moot was weighing if and how it could intervene against Luria, potentially by buddying up to Aurvandil, before war between Barca and Aurvandil started. There's also the small matter of Rynn basically flipping a coin between an alliance with LV or Aurvandil. Either there's some serious propagandizing going on here, or Moot rank and file were (impressively) kept in the dark.
