Question for the magistrates, In order for it to be a violation does he have to act on the threat and actually punish or is it a violation just to threaten to punish for inactivity?
By my interpretation, by threatening consequences, you cross the line. Saying "I want the army in X by tomorrow morning" is fine, we don't want to be too aggressive about IRs and there needs to be some way to organise and work the army. But if you say something like that, there's an implicit understanding that some people might not make it for OOC reasons, and you are to simply accept those reasons, even if they are never given (nobody has to explain his OOC reasons). Therefore, you can not threaten consequences, not fines, not bans, not even a stern look.
