The argument against this is that Allomere could have no way of knowing that Fal'Cie was still online when he issued the order, even though he'd been active recently, even minutes before.
It is truth... but those who are making decidion about is Allomere guilty for violating IR should also have on mind tha people get in character while playing the game, and sometime it is really difficult when you are forced to balance between what you want to say and ooc forma you have to sattisfy to not violate any rule.
To explain:
If person A states: I order you to go to X.
*Person B: I will disobey.
**Person A natural reaction (if person A is superior to person B) is to say: You will be punished if you disobey.
It is easy to criticize from this point, but at the time when person A wrote letter **, person A was already iritated by the reaction of person B (person A is only a human, not a mashine) so it can easily forget the fact that person B could simply disconect after writing the letter * (especially if person A enjoed the game and got in charracter).
Duo to that, it would be unfair to judge person A simply by his action, but all circumstances that led person A to state the forbiden sentence should be included.
