Author Topic: Abuse of Vulgarity  (Read 27000 times)

Fury

  • Guest
Re: Abuse of Vulgarity
« Reply #15: July 18, 2012, 06:11:19 AM »
Quote
This is a tool to enforce proper roleplaying and keep the atmosphere and quality level of the game up. The focus is on the manner of speech, not its contents.
Proper RP, atmosphere, upholding standards of nobility/RP,  as pertaining to manner of speech - not idealogies, philosophies, religion.

A lack of proper title, while related to speech - is not vulgar but disrespect, depending. Here's an interesting take someone posted recently:
Quote
Bob -- Wife/parents/siblings
Robert -- Cousins, lifelong friends
Robert Fitzpatrick -- Distant cousins, close friends
Sir Robert Westham -- friends
Robert, Earl of Westham -- court officials, other nobility, letters between good friends
Earl Robert Fitzpatrick of Westham -- letters from aquaintances in other courts
Earl Fitzpatrick of Westham -- letters from other courts
Earl Westham -- letters between dignitaries

Vellos, what you want to uphold seems very much related to SMA and this wasn't on Dwilight. Also, it would be an SMA violation not a vulgarity report.

On policing where the accused is unknown, we can cross that bridge when we come to it. This court system is for disputes between players so if someone has a grievance then we have to look into it regardless of gains or motives.

On examples, Tom doesn't like hypotheticals. I both agree and disagree. Sometimes you need an example to see things clearer. Other times, hypotheticals will create unnecessary tangents and prolong the case. In this case it seems rather clear but I would be interested to read about the tangents in separate threads.