Author Topic: The Marrocidenian war  (Read 552152 times)

Chenier

  • Exalted Emperor
  • ******
  • Posts: 8120
    • View Profile
Re: The Marrocidenian war
« Reply #810: December 11, 2012, 11:47:43 PM »
We would have sacked Paisly, but to be fair that would have validated the defence Terran and D'Hara raised, and if you're happy to bottle yourself up in Paisly whilst we hem you in through a force defending the Motte and Bailey of Paisland, go for it. If Aurvandil's armies had been in better shape we would have sacked Chateau Saffalore (Chesney was a bit too well defended I think to warrant the attack) and actually done some damage to Terran, as ultimately D'Hara is the weaker link of the two and the easiest to strike, so one we can do at our leisure, whilst we actually need to weaken Terran to reach a strategic goal in the war.

Of course our armies were much too limp this campaign to do much of anything, but it has at least wasted the time of our opponents and frustrated their defences, a minor victory.

Sure, absolutely. You totally weren't afraid of the defense, you just didn't want to "validate it". Of course.

Just as we just saw laughing at your invasion force. We just didn't move out because we didn't care to "validate it" either.
Dit donc camarade soleil / Ne trouves-tu ça pas plutôt con / De donner une journée pareil / À un patron