Author Topic: Southern War of Nobility (Civil war in Madina)  (Read 275079 times)

Indirik

  • Exalted Emperor
  • ******
  • Posts: 10849
  • No pressure, no diamonds.
    • View Profile
Re: Civil war in Madina
« Reply #315: September 12, 2011, 08:09:24 PM »
Well, you could do what everyone else is doing, and plot your invasion of D'Hara. :P
If at first you don't succeed, don't take up skydiving.

Perth

  • Honourable King
  • *****
  • Posts: 2037
  • Current Character: Kemen
    • View Profile
Re: Civil war in Madina
« Reply #316: September 12, 2011, 09:09:48 PM »
TMP is getting so annoying for Terran, that I'm borderline thinking we should send armies south to interfere in the Madinan civil war, just so we can get rid of TMP.

Or north to Itauland?

Or to fool around in Golden Farrow, just for kicks?
"A tale is but half told when only one person tells it." - The Saga of Grettir the Strong
- Current: Kemen (D'hara) - Past: Kerwin (Eston), Kale (Phantaria, Terran, Melodia)

Nathan

  • Mighty Duke
  • ****
  • Posts: 713
    • View Profile
Re: Civil war in Madina
« Reply #317: September 12, 2011, 09:34:24 PM »
Well, you could do what everyone else is doing, and plot your invasion of D'Hara. :P

WHAT!? Can't be doing that! Halicos will lose his best trading partner! However, as the Ferengi say, "war is good for business".

Chenier

  • Exalted Emperor
  • ******
  • Posts: 8120
    • View Profile
Re: Civil war in Madina
« Reply #318: September 12, 2011, 09:45:55 PM »
TMP is getting so annoying for Terran, that I'm borderline thinking we should send armies south to interfere in the Madinan civil war, just so we can get rid of TMP.

Yea, send troops to aid both sides. :P

WHAT!? Can't be doing that! Halicos will lose his best trading partner! However, as the Ferengi say, "war is good for business".

War amongst foreigners is good for business. War involving key allies and/or trading partners isn't.
Dit donc camarade soleil / Ne trouves-tu ça pas plutôt con / De donner une journée pareil / À un patron

Telrunya

  • Mighty Duke
  • ****
  • Posts: 1056
    • View Profile
Re: Civil war in Madina
« Reply #319: September 12, 2011, 09:48:27 PM »
*points to the Zuma* Enemy that helps with TMP and will never perish or be destroyed, allowing you to get rid of TMP forever!

Indirik

  • Exalted Emperor
  • ******
  • Posts: 10849
  • No pressure, no diamonds.
    • View Profile
Re: Civil war in Madina
« Reply #320: September 12, 2011, 10:19:33 PM »
... allowing you to get rid of TMP forever!

... by getting your realm destroyed.
If at first you don't succeed, don't take up skydiving.

Nathan

  • Mighty Duke
  • ****
  • Posts: 713
    • View Profile
Re: Civil war in Madina
« Reply #321: September 12, 2011, 10:30:51 PM »
War amongst foreigners is good for business. War involving key allies and/or trading partners isn't.

Shh, don't say that too loudly, the D'Harans might hear you!

Chenier

  • Exalted Emperor
  • ******
  • Posts: 8120
    • View Profile
Re: Civil war in Madina
« Reply #322: September 12, 2011, 11:44:04 PM »
Shh, don't say that too loudly, the D'Harans might hear you!

I'm the duke of Paisly  :o
Dit donc camarade soleil / Ne trouves-tu ça pas plutôt con / De donner une journée pareil / À un patron

Galvez

  • Mighty Duke
  • ****
  • Posts: 506
  • Veni, Vidi, Vici
    • View Profile
    • Facebook
Re: Civil war in Madina
« Reply #323: September 13, 2011, 12:00:05 AM »
TMP is getting so annoying for Terran, that I'm borderline thinking we should send armies south to interfere in the Madinan civil war, just so we can get rid of TMP.
I would support that. We are getting bored ourselves as well. Little monster activity lately.
"Men willingly believe what they wish." - Julius Caesar

Carna

  • Noble Lord
  • ***
  • Posts: 173
  • Not always sober
    • View Profile
Re: Civil war in Madina
« Reply #324: September 13, 2011, 12:46:43 AM »
Heh, yeah, but isn't there some alternating views in the moot as to who to support? Some say Madina, some say Aurvandil. Could Terran attack Aurvandil (or Madina) while travelling through Barca if Barca wishes to support the other one? Might actually be worth discussing in the guild.

Chenier

  • Exalted Emperor
  • ******
  • Posts: 8120
    • View Profile
Re: Civil war in Madina
« Reply #325: September 13, 2011, 01:03:01 AM »
Heh, yeah, but isn't there some alternating views in the moot as to who to support? Some say Madina, some say Aurvandil. Could Terran attack Aurvandil (or Madina) while travelling through Barca if Barca wishes to support the other one? Might actually be worth discussing in the guild.

We should totally have 2 of our realms attack one realm, and the other realm attack the other. No more TMP.

And if one side starts to win? Have all three realms side with the other.
Dit donc camarade soleil / Ne trouves-tu ça pas plutôt con / De donner une journée pareil / À un patron

Carna

  • Noble Lord
  • ***
  • Posts: 173
  • Not always sober
    • View Profile
Re: Civil war in Madina
« Reply #326: September 13, 2011, 01:46:42 AM »
Heh. And when one of us comes up against the other? One goes neutral? Both? How about the Moot helps Aurvandil until they have the tower, and then switch sides until Madina has the tower back? :D

Vellos

  • Honourable King
  • *****
  • Posts: 3736
  • Stodgy Old Man in Training
    • View Profile
Re: Civil war in Madina
« Reply #327: September 13, 2011, 02:48:34 AM »
Heh. And when one of us comes up against the other? One goes neutral? Both? How about the Moot helps Aurvandil until they have the tower, and then switch sides until Madina has the tower back? :D

This. Please. Just declare that we refuse to allow any power to hold Tower Fatmilak for a period greater than 6 months. We will not limit the war to Fatmilak, however: we will assault Aurvandil's inlands until they relinquish claim on it, or we will besiege Madina City (or the tower itself via Aurvandil).

This could be so much fun. Completely psychotic and likely to get the Moot a bad rep... but fun.

Of course, we wouldn't get a bad rep if we maybe convinced the Lurian realms to get in on the fun. But they're all gung ho about killing monsters. So they might disapprove.
"A neutral humanism is either a pedantic artifice or a prologue to the inhuman." - George Steiner

Bedwyr

  • Mighty Duke
  • ****
  • Posts: 1762
  • House Bedwyr
    • View Profile
Re: Civil war in Madina
« Reply #328: September 13, 2011, 02:57:29 AM »
More like we wouldn't like the constant damage to food producing regions.
"You know what the chain of command is? It's the chain I go get and beat you with 'til ya understand who's in ruttin' command here!"

Chenier

  • Exalted Emperor
  • ******
  • Posts: 8120
    • View Profile
Re: Civil war in Madina
« Reply #329: September 13, 2011, 03:34:48 AM »
More like we wouldn't like the constant damage to food producing regions.

Neither would we.

I actually quite like that it's the two capitals fighting, leaving the food-producing regions mostly unharmed. Should make it a rule that Madina city remains rogue forever, though, don't want to see food going back into that city.

Heh. And when one of us comes up against the other? One goes neutral? Both? How about the Moot helps Aurvandil until they have the tower, and then switch sides until Madina has the tower back? :D

We take a beer and watch the others kill themselves.
Dit donc camarade soleil / Ne trouves-tu ça pas plutôt con / De donner une journée pareil / À un patron