I am not sure where to post so I will post here and avoid to disturb the original topic that started this offtopic thread.
If you take your time to read the previous case of Kyle/Woelfy were he was the complainer, and later read the actual case, it seems to me that both cases were judged with partiality by the magistrates and from the beginning not all evidences were brought to the case, like the complain Kyle did to the titans, that was relevant to the case, IMO.
On the first case (
http://forum.battlemaster.org/index.php/topic,3693.0.html) if I am not wrong, he is being accused of threaten to complain to the titans about the fact that he was being harassed to step down?
And I could not find a case or a verdict.
On the second case when I read (
http://forum.battlemaster.org/index.php/topic,3863.0.html) one magistrate saying it is a "mommy, mommy call", I stopped reading there and only today I read all of it and could not find the verdict.
On the third case (
http://forum.battlemaster.org/index.php/topic,4205.0.html) a case from outside the forum, with no rules for it, have a case, have a verdict, not using the old evidences from old cases what was done in the previous cases.
On the other case sent to the titans we don't know nothing except his complains were not being taking in account and it seems Woelfy lost trust on the titans after this and that's why he did not defend himself.
I suggest you, magistrates try to read it all again, and try to do it as it was the first time and as it was written by a third person. Kyle act like a jerk (his words) but even a jerk have rights and need to be defended.
Maybe I can be doing a mistake, maybe I can not understand all of it as English is not my primary language but, from my point of view, these 3 cases are a big mess of ooc and bias from everyone but are cases that can be useful to change the rules or to set up a precedent. The way it is now, it would make a bad precedent though.